1 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Ferrometallurgy and School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai
Analysis of precipitation behavior of MnS in sulfur-bearing steel system with finite-difference segregation model
1 State Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Ferrometallurgy and School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai
摘要 To further reveal the influence of micro-segregation on the precipitation behavior of MnS in sulfur-bearing steel system, a coupled model of micro-segregation and MnS precipitation was established by the finite-difference method based on various calculation domains and the solid diffusion degrees, and a new controlled diffusion equation with more stable convergence was also used. The steels, 49MnVS3 and 1215, were used to analyze the influence of calculation domain, segregation model and S content on the precipitation behavior of MnS. The calculation results were verified by a high-temperature confocal laser scanning microscope (HT-CLSM). The results show that the domain has little effect on the precipitation temperature, precipitation solid fraction and precipitation amount of MnS, but affects the precipitation location and segregation of the solutes. For low- and medium- sulfur steels, the temperatures calculated by the diffusion control growth (DCG) model and the Lever model were nearly identical, whereas the temperature calculated by the Scheil model was smaller. However, for high-sulfur steels, the precipitation temperatures calculated by three segregation models were nearly same. The precipitation solid fraction is more reasonable to describe the precipitation behavior of MnS. The precipitation behavior of MnS, observed by the HT-CLSM, matches well with the DCG model.
Abstract：To further reveal the influence of micro-segregation on the precipitation behavior of MnS in sulfur-bearing steel system, a coupled model of micro-segregation and MnS precipitation was established by the finite-difference method based on various calculation domains and the solid diffusion degrees, and a new controlled diffusion equation with more stable convergence was also used. The steels, 49MnVS3 and 1215, were used to analyze the influence of calculation domain, segregation model and S content on the precipitation behavior of MnS. The calculation results were verified by a high-temperature confocal laser scanning microscope (HT-CLSM). The results show that the domain has little effect on the precipitation temperature, precipitation solid fraction and precipitation amount of MnS, but affects the precipitation location and segregation of the solutes. For low- and medium- sulfur steels, the temperatures calculated by the diffusion control growth (DCG) model and the Lever model were nearly identical, whereas the temperature calculated by the Scheil model was smaller. However, for high-sulfur steels, the precipitation temperatures calculated by three segregation models were nearly same. The precipitation solid fraction is more reasonable to describe the precipitation behavior of MnS. The precipitation behavior of MnS, observed by the HT-CLSM, matches well with the DCG model.
HU De-Lin,LIU Hui,XIE Jian-Bei, et al. Analysis of precipitation behavior of MnS in sulfur-bearing steel system with finite-difference segregation model[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2018, 25(8): 803-812.
[1]
L. F. Zhang, Iron Steel Res. Int. 13 (2006) No. 3, 1-8.
[2]
H. Schumann, Metallographie, Deutscher Verlag fuer Grundstoffindustrie, Stuttgart, 1991.
[3]
G. Miyamoto, T. Shinyoshi, J. Yamaguchi, T. Furuhara, T. Maki, R. Uemori, Scripta Mater. 48 (2003) No. 4, 371-377.
[4]
J. Lehmann, M. Nadif, Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 73 (2011) No. 1, 493-511.
[5]
G. C. Wang, S. L. Li, X. G. Ai, C. M. Zhang, C. B. Lai, Iron Steel Res. Int. 22 (2015) No. 7, 566-572.
[6]
Y. J. Xia, F. M. Wang, Steelmaking. 27 (2011) No. 3, 55-59 (in Chinese).
[7]
P. J. Chen, C. Y. Zhu, G. Q. Li, Y. W. Dong, Z. C. Zhang, ISIJ Int. 57 (2017) No. 6, 1019-1028.
[8]
Y. D. Li, C. J. Liu, C. L. Li, M. F. Jiang, Iron Steel Res. Int. 22 (2015) No. 6, 457-463.
[9]
S. K. Choudhary, A. Ghosh, ISIJ Int. 49 (2009) No. 12, 1819-1827.
[10]
L. Xiang, E. B. Yue, D. D. Fan, S. T. Qiu, P. Zhao, Iron Steel Res. Int. 15 (2008) No. 5, 88-94.
[11]
X. W. Zhang, L. F. Zhang, W. Yang, Y. C. Dong, Y. Z. Li, Iron and Steel. 51 (2016) No. 9, 30-39 (in Chinese).
[12]
D. You, C. Bernhard, G. Wieser, S. Michelic, Steel Res. Int. 87 (2016) No. 7, 840-849.
[13]
S. Luo, M. Y. Zhu, C. Ji, Z. Z. Cai, Iron and Steel. 45 (2010) No. 6, 31-36 (in Chinese).
[14]
Y. Ueshima, Y. Sawada, S. Mizoguchi, H. Kajioka, Metall. Trans. A. 20 (1989) No. 8, 1375-1383.
[15]
Y. Ueshima, S. Mizoguchi, T. Matsumiya, H. Kajioka, Metall. Trans. B. 17 (1986) No. 4, 845-859.
[16]
Y. Meng, B. G. Thomas, Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 34 (2003) No. 5, 685-705.
[17]
T. Kawawa, R. Imai, Tetsu-to-Hagane. 63 (1977) 1965-1974 (in Japanese).
[18]
J. R. Davis, Metals handbook: desk edition, 2nd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1998.
[19]
Y. M. Won, B. G. Thomas, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 32 (2001) No. 7, 1755-1767.
[20]
I. Barin, O. Knacke, O. Kubaschewski, Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances, Springer, New York, 1977.
[21]
X. G. Huang, Principles of steel metallurgy. 4th ed., Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, 2013 (in Chinese).
[22]
Z. Ma, D. Janke, ISIJ Int. 38 (1998) No. 1, 46-52.
[23]
W. C. Li, Metallurgy and Materials Physical Chemistry, Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, 2001 (in Chinese).
[24]
X. L. Wan, K. M. Wu, K. C. Nune, Y. Li, L. Cheng, Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining. 20 (2015) No. 3, 254-263.
[25]
G. C. Jin, S. Y. Chen, Q. C. Li, G. W. Chang, X. D. Yue, Iron Steel Res. Int. 20 (2013) No. 10, 94-98.
2018, Vol. 25 
