中间包流场控制技术的进展

doi:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1005-4006.20210082

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (9697 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要合理控制中间包的流场有利于促进钢液中夹杂物上浮、均匀钢液成分和温度。水模型试验和数值模拟是两种主要的中间包流场研究方法,各有优缺点应相互补充。数值模拟成本低廉速度快,但受限于边界条件的不确定性和湍流模型的局限性难以完全真实反映中间包内的流场。水模型试验能够较为准确地模拟中间包内流场,但无法准确模拟温度场、水口结瘤、覆盖剂和吹气等对中间包流场的影响。研究表明,湍流控制器对降低长水口钢液射流的湍动能、均匀钢液温度和成分、聚拢射流让其转向向上流动降低死区体积分数、延长平均停留时间和优化流场结构具有很好的作用。湍流控制器、堰、坝和导流挡墙合理组合,协同发挥的控流效果,优于单一控流装置的效果。合理调节堰与包底距离、挡坝高度、堰与挡坝距离、堰与出流口距离、挡坝开孔的个数、尺寸和角度,可以优化中间包流场,促进夹杂物去除。气幕挡墙对钢液进行气洗可以提高钢液洁净度。环形气幕挡墙解决了条形气幕挡墙夹杂物去除率低、且不稳定的问题,提高了夹杂物去除率。最后,中间包流场数学模型精细化,并考虑连铸过程中更多工艺与边界条件的影响是未来发展的趋势。对于中间包流场研究的特定问题,针对性设定优化指标,会使得优化研究工作事半功倍。水模型试验作为中间包控流技术的另一种重要研究手段,同样越趋精确化,不断有研究者以提高试验精度为目的在试验方法和测量原理上进行探索和创新。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	作者相关文章
	刘逸波
	杨健

关键词 ：中间包, 模拟方法, 控流装置, 吹氩, 夹杂物

Abstract：By reasonably controlling the flow field in the tundish, the inclusions in the molten steel can be promoted to rise and the composition and temperature of molten steel can be homogenized. Water model experiment and numerical simulation are two main methods to study the flow field in tundish, each of which has its own advantages and disadvantages and should complement each other. Numerical simulation is cheap and fast, but due to the uncertainty of boundary conditions and the limitation of turbulence model, it is difficult to fully reflect the flow field in the tundish. The model test can accurately simulate the flow field in the tundish, but it cannot accurately simulate the influence of temperature field, nodule, covering agent and blowing on the flow field in the tundish.The results show that the turbulence controller has a good effect on reducing the turbulent kinetic energy of the molten steel jet from long nozzle, homogenizing the temperature and compositions of the molten steel, diverting the liquid steel jet upward to reduce the volume fraction of dead zone, prolonging the average residence time and optimizing the flow field structure. The combination of turbulence controllers with weir, dam and diversion wall is better than that using single flow control device.The tundish flow field can be optimized and the inclusion removal can be promoted by reasonably adjusting the distance between the weir and the tundish bottom, the height of the dam, the distance between the weir and the dam, the distance between the weir and the outlet, the number, size and angle of the opening of the dam. The gas curtain wall improves the cleanliness of liquid steel. The annular gas curtain can solve the problem of low and unstable inclusion removal ratio with the strip gas curtain to improve the inclusion removal ratio. Finally, it is the trend that the mathematical model of tundish flow field is refined and the influence of more process and boundary conditions is considered. For the specific research of tundish flow field, the optimization index can be set pertinently to make the optimization work more efficient. As another important research technique of tundish flow field, water model experiment has been continuously explored and innovated in experimental methods and measurement principles for the purpose of improving experimental accuracy.

Key words： tundish simulation method flow control device argon blowing inclusion

收稿日期: 2021-07-07

引用本文:

刘逸波, 杨健. 中间包流场控制技术的进展[J]. 连铸, 2021, 40(5): 12-33. LIU Yi-bo, YANG Jian. Progress on flow field control technology of tundish. CONTINUOUS CASTING, 2021, 40(5): 12-33.

链接本文:

http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_lz/CN/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1005-4006.20210082 或 http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_lz/CN/Y2021/V40/I5/12

[1]	王建军, 包燕平, 曲英. 中间包冶金学[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2001.
[2]	张立峰, 蔡开科. 中间包冶金技术的发展[J]. 炼钢, 1997 (4): 42.
[3]	李翼祺, 流体力学基硏[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1974.
[4]	Sahai Y, Emi T. Melt flow characterization in continuous casting tundishes[J]. Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, 2007, 36(6): 667.
[5]	徐其言, 刘辉, 周俐. 70 t连铸中间包内钢液流动的物理模拟[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 34(1): 16.
[6]	姜涛, 陈远清, 仇圣桃. 板坯连铸中间包控流装置优化的水模研究[J]. 连铸, 2009(2): 1.
[7]	乐可襄, 于国庆. 板坯中间包控流装置结构优化的水模研究[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 29(2): 102.
[8]	孔章情, 孔辉, 周俐, 等. 二流中间包内型优化的水模实验研究[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 28(1): 4.
[9]	倪国龙, 艾立群, 赵定国, 等. 基于示踪剂法板坯连铸40 t中间包内钢液流动行为的物理模拟[J]. 特殊钢, 2016, 37(5): 26.
[10]	唐德池, 季晨曦, 张宏艳. 控流装置对中间包流场影响的水模型研究[J]. 连铸, 2017(5): 7.
[11]	李洋, 程常桂, 张丰. 连铸板坯中间包内控流装置优化的水模型研究[J]. 铸造技术, 2017(5): 1075.
[12]	赵岩, 雷洪. 两流非对称中间包结构优化与应用研究[J]. 材料与冶金学报, 2017, 16(3): 165.
[13]	张江山. 钢包长水口应用于中间包湍流控制的基础研究与实践[D]. 北京:北京科技大学, 2017.
[14]	韩丽辉, 于春梅, 冯根生. 中间包水模型自动控制系统的研发[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2015, 34(7): 84.
[15]	梁新腾, 张捷宇, 刘旭峰, 等. 连铸中间包内湍流控制器控流过程的数值模拟[J]. 上海金属, 2007(3): 49.
[16]	梁新腾, 张捷宇, 王妍, 等. 板坯连铸中间包控流装置优化研究[C]//第四届发展中国家连铸国际会议论文集. 北京: 中国金属学会, 2008: 3.
[17]	王建, 张淑兰, 陈文智, 等. 不同感应中间包留钢液位下受钢过程中钢液流场的数值模拟[J]. 热加工工艺, 2018, 47(1):100.
[18]	赵丹婷, 刘爱强, 仇圣桃. 不同流量下单流中间包水力学模拟试验[J]. 铸造技术, 2016(8): 1693.
[19]	赵丹婷, 刘爱强, 仇圣桃. 带过滤器中间包流场的数学物理模拟和应用[J]. 钢铁, 2017, 52(1): 27.
[20]	张立夫, 王鲁毅, 崔福祥. 厚板坯连铸中间包流场优化[J]. 鞍钢技术, 2019(5): 14.
[21]	王明辉, 李京社, 唐海燕, 等. 基于RTD曲线优化八流中间包控流装置的研究[J]. 工业加热, 2016, 45(6): 49.
[22]	王芳, 李宝宽, 沈峰满. 离心式中间包流场的大涡模拟研究[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2007(8): 1143.
[23]	朱苗勇, 泽田郁夫. 连铸中间包内三维湍流流动的数值模拟[J]. 金属学报, 1997(11): 1215.
[24]	刘中秋, 王强, 李宝宽, 等. 连铸中间包湍流流动及夹杂物分布的大涡模拟[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 33(5): 669.
[25]	Srivastava A, Chattopadhyay K. A mechanistic model to estimate the effect of ladle slag entrainment on the tundish covering slag layer[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 2021, 52(3):1279.
[26]	任耘, 孙璐艳, 赵福才, 等. CaF2及碱度变化对中间包覆盖剂黏度的影响[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2015, 27(1): 35.
[27]	田月华, 许鸿英, 王占荣, 等. 高频炉燃烧红外吸收法测定中包覆盖剂中的碳含量[J]. 河北冶金, 2016(12): 59.
[28]	宋祖峰, 陆向东, 荚江霞, 等. 熔融制样-X射线荧光光谱法测定钢水中间包覆盖剂的5种组分[J]. 理化检验(化学分册), 2018, 54(6): 723.
[29]	汪磊. 湍流控制器对T形中间包钢液流场影响的数理模拟研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2010.
[30]	张富强, 姜振生, 吕志生. 板坯连铸中间包湍流控制器的应用研究[C]//中国金属学会2003中国钢铁年会论文集(3). 北京: 中国金属学会, 2003: 424.
[31]	Morales R D, Lopez R S, Palafox R J, et al. Numerical and modeling analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer of liquid steel in a tundish with different flow control devices[J]. ISIJ International, 1999, 39(5): 455.
[32]	Heaslip L J, Schade J. Physical modeling and visualization of liquid steel flow behavior during continuous casting[J]. Iron and Steelmaker, 1999, 26(1): 33.
[33]	Merder T, Pieprzyca J. Optimization of two-strand industrial tundish work with use of turbulence inhibitors: physical and numerical modeling[J]. Steel Research International, 2012, 83 (11): 1029.
[34]	张立, 黄耀文, 杨时标, 等. 连铸中间包湍流控制器水模实验研究[J]. 钢铁, 2002, 37(12): 17.
[35]	Jorge M, Diego M, Matías F, et al. Design and plant experience using an advanced pouring box to receive and distribute the steel in a six strand tundish[J]. ISIJ International, 1999, 39(8): 787.
[36]	叶琛, 金焱, 常正昇, 等. 中间包湍流抑制器挡片对夹杂物去除的影响[J]. 铸造技术,2017, 38(6): 1419.
[37]	李怡宏, 赵立华, 包燕平, 等. 板坯中间包内钢液流动特性[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2014, 36(1): 21.
[38]	苑品, 包燕平, 崔衡, 等. 高品质IF钢连铸中间包降低残钢量的水模型研究[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2011, 33(增刊1): 1.
[39]	Jha P K, Rao P S, Dewan A. Effect of height and position of dams on inclusion removal in a six strand tundish[J]. ISIJ International, 2008, 48(2): 154.
[40]	李宁, 包燕平, 林路, 等. 挡渣墙对板坯连铸中间包流场的影响研究[J]. 钢铁钒钛, 2014, 35(3): 83.
[41]	Sahai Y, Ahuja R. Steel flow and mixing of melt in steelmaking tundishes[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 1986, 13(5): 241.
[42]	曹雄, 张胤, 贾攀, 等. 中间包结构优化的水模型正交试验[J]. 特殊钢, 2009, 30(4): 39.
[43]	Schade J, Smith M P, Palmer S E. Doubling tundish volume at AK steel's middletown works: Structural criteria, design considerations and operating results[J]. Iron and Steelmaker, 1996, 23(10): 93.
[44]	李茂旺, 李怡宏, 董超. 流钢孔对中间包流体行为影响的数值模拟[J]. 中国冶金, 2020, 30(6): 55.
[45]	Steak S P, Suzuki Y, Bullock R A. Improving steel cleanliness through tundish baffle technology[J]. Iron and Steelmaker, 1991, 36(8): 17.
[46]	Lowry M L, Sahai Y. Investigation of steel flow in a continuous casting tundish with multiple-hole baffles using mathematical models and tracer studies[J].Iron and Steelmaker, 1991, 18 (8): 53.
[47]	屈天鹏, 姜茂发, 王德永. 四流中间包钢液流动行为的数学物理模拟[J]. 中国冶金, 2009, 19(1): 6.
[48]	陈登福, 胡锐, 王青峡. 连铸中间包多孔挡墙设置优化的数学物理模拟[J]. 过程工程学报, 2008, 8(增刊1): 49.
[49]	张剑君, 高文芳, 曹同友. 武钢60 t双流连铸中间包流场优化试验研究[J]. 炼钢, 2013, 29(5): 61.
[50]	韩东, 艾新港, 李胜利. 控流装置对双流中间包流动影响的模拟实验[J]. 辽宁科技大学学报, 2019, 42(2): 85.
[51]	Collur M M, Love D B, Patil B V. Use of flow modifiers to improve performance of tundish[C]//Steelmaking Conference Proceedings. Chicago: 1997: 313.
[52]	LIU J G, YAN H C, LIU L, et al. Water modeling of optimizing tundish flow field[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2007, 14 (3): 13.
[53]	常正昇, 金焱, 程常桂. 连铸中间包带过滤体湍流抑制装置的水模研究[J]. 连铸, 2015(3): 14.
[54]	邹涛, 康旭, 屈乐欣, 等. 单流中间包控流装置优化的水模型试验与应用[J]. 炼钢, 2019(5): 43.
[55]	陈军利, 郝阳, 李任春. 邯钢32 t 8流连铸中间包流场的优化研究[J]. 特殊钢, 2017(1): 13.
[56]	李晓祥, 钟良才, 阳祥富, 等. 连铸长水口吹氩气泡大小及分布试验研究[C]//第十一届中国钢铁年会论文集. 北京: 中国金属学会, 2017: 6.
[57]	钟良才, 阳祥富, 李晓祥. 钢包长水口吹氩长水口结构对气泡大小分布影响[C]//2018年(第二十届)全国炼钢学术会议大会报告及论文摘要集. 成都: 中国金属学会, 2018: 1.
[58]	张彩军, 张林杨, 刘宏强. 板坯塞棒和中间包上水口吹氩工艺水模型研究[J]. 铸造技术, 2017, 38(5): 1084.
[59]	阳祥富, 常文杰, 钟良才. 连铸长水口吹氩气泡行为的试验研究[J]. 炼钢, 2018, 34(2): 12.
[60]	钟良才, 李晓祥, 阳祥富, 等. 长水口吹氩小气泡在中间包内流动数学模拟研究[C]//第十一届中国钢铁年会论文集. 北京: 中国金属学会, 2017: 7.
[61]	陈登福, 曾丁丁, 任常富. 方坯连铸长水口-吹氩无氧化浇铸技术[J]. 特殊钢, 2004(1): 48.
[62]	崔衡, 包燕平, 刘建华. 中间包气幕挡墙水模与工业试验研究[J]. 炼钢, 2010, 26(2): 45.
[63]	武光君, 王中学, 高立福. 连铸中间包环形气幕挡墙吹氩冶金技术开发与应用[J]. 连铸, 2019(5): 21.
[64]	武光君, 付守森. 板坯连铸中间包吹氩冶金新技术开发与应用[J]. 莱钢科技, 2020(1): 36.
[65]	Tomasz M, Jacek P, Marek W, et al. Evolution of the numerical model describing the distribution of non-metallic inclusions in the tundish[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(9): 2229.
[66]	Sheng D Y, Jönsson P. Effect of thermal buoyancy on fluid flow and residence-time distribution in a single-strand tundish[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(8): 1906.
[67]	SHENG D Y, CHEN D F. Comparison of fluid flow and temperature distribution in a single-strand tundish with different flow control devices[J]. Metals, 2021, 11(5): 796.
[68]	WANG Q, TAN C, HUANG A, et al. Numerical simulation on refractory wear and inclusion formation in continuous casting tundish[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions, 2021, 52(3): 1344.
[69]	Adam C. New insight on liquid steel microalloying by pulse-step method in two-strand slab tundish by numerical simulations[J]. Crystals, 2021, 11(4):448.
[70]	Dipak M. Tundish process performance parameters and their direct estimation from a new, plant measurement-based formalism[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2021, 52(1): 23.
[71]	SHENG D Y, ZOU Z S. Application of tanks-in-series model to characterize non-ideal flow regimes in continuous casting tundish[J]. Metals, 2021, 11(2): 208.
[72]	DING C Y, LEI H, NIU H, et al. Effects of salt tracer volume and concentration on residence time distribution curves for characterization of liquid steel behavior in metallurgical tundish[J]. Metals, 2021, 11(3): 2075.
[73]	Akriti N, Antariksh G, Rajeev K S. Novel image analysis-based method for residence time distribution analysis in steelmaking tundish[J]. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2021, (4): 243.