|
|
Analysis and comparison of energy saving and emission reduction of blast furnace injection with different hydrogen-rich mediums |
WANG Xindong1, QIE Yana2,3, LÜ Qing2,3, WANG Yifan2,3 |
1. HBIS Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050000, Hebei, China; 2. College of Metallurgy and Energy, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063009, Hebei, China; 3. Key Laboratory for Advanced Metallurgy Technology of Ministry of Education, Tangshan 063009, Hebei, China |
|
|
Abstract At present, China′s iron and steel enterprises are still based on the long process process of blast furnace-converter, and the Hydrogen enrichment operation of blast furnace is one of the important directions in the development of hydrogen metallurgy in China. There are many kinds of hydrogen rich medium and injection mode, so it is very important to select the hydrogen rich process of blast furnace reasonably and effectively. In order to determine the appropriate hydrogen enrichment process, the concept of "carbon consumption-carbon emission-coke ratio-raceway adiabatic flame temperature operating window" is proposed based on the Rist operating line tool with hydrogen and combined with the calculation of the overall and regional heat balance of blast furnaces. The energy saving and emission reduction effects of blast furnace injection of coke oven gas, natural gas and hydrogen at normal temperature and preheating conditions are compared and analyzed. The results show that coke ratio,raceway adiabatic flame temperature, carbon consumption and CO2emission all increase with the increase of hydrogen rich medium injection, but the effect of oxygen enrichment rate on these indexes is opposite. In the case of blast furnace without coal injection, the hydrogen rich medium injection technology can reduce carbon consumption and carbon emission, but the coke ratio is still high. By comparing the operation window area size of different hydrogen-rich processes, it is concluded that blast furnace coal powder injection(PCI) + pure hydrogen in blast furnace has higher energy saving and emission reduction. The maximum injection volume and limiting link of different hydrogen-rich technology can be intuitively obtained from the operation window. The results show that the maximum injection amounts of BF PCI + natural gas, BF PCI + coke oven gas and BF PCI + H2are 128, 359 and 500 m3/t respectively, and the energy saving and emission reduction rate of blast furnace coal injection + 950 ℃ preheating hydrogen is increased by about 20% compared with normal temperature conditions.
|
Received: 09 June 2023
|
|
|
|
[1] 世界金属导报. 关于新形势下炼铁工业发展的认识[J/OL]. http://www.worldmetals.com.cn/viscms/search.jspx?q=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%ACCOURSE50&siteId=3.[2020-11-17].(World Metals Herald. Understanding of the development of ironmaking industry under the new situation[J/OL].http://www.worldmetals.com.cn/viscms/search.jspx?q=%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%ACCOURSE50&siteId=3.[2020-11-17].) [2] 王新东,上官方钦,邢奕,等.“双碳”目标下钢铁企业低碳发展的技术路径[J].工程科学学报,2023, 45(5): 853.(WANG X D, SHANGGUAN F Q, XING Y, et al. Research on the low-carbon development technology route of iron and steel enterprises under the "double carbon" target[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering,2023, 45(5):853.) [3] 郄亚娜, 靳亚涛, 康媛, 等. 高炉富氢对钒钛矿软熔滴落性能的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2023, 58(5):31.(QIE Y N, JIN Y T, KANG Y, et al. Influence of hydrogen-rich on the softening and melting property of blast furnace burden with vanadium and titanium[J]. Iron and Steel, 2023, 58(5):31.) [4] 王新东,郝良元.现代炼铁工艺及低碳发展方向分析[J].中国冶金,2021,31(5):1.(WANG X D,HAO L Y. Analysis of modern ironmaking technology and low-carbon development direction[J]. China Metallurgy, 2021, 31(5):1.) [5] 王新东,田京雷,宋程远.大型钢铁企业绿色制造创新实践与展望[J].钢铁,2018,53(2):1.(WANG X D,TIAN J L,SONG C Y. Innovative practice technology and outlook in large iron and steel enterprise green manufacturing[J]. Iron and Steel, 2018,53(2):1.) [6] 王新东,赵志龙,李传民,等.基于富氢焦炉煤气零重整的氢冶金工程技术[J].钢铁,2023,58(5):11.(WANG X D,ZHAO Z L,LI C M,et al. Hydrogen metallurgy engineering technologies based onzero reforming of hydrogen enriched coke oven gas[J]. Iron and Steel, 2023,58(5):11.) [7] CHANG Y F, WAN F, YAO X L, et al. Influence of hydrogen production on the CO2 emissions reduction of hydrogen metallurgy transformation in iron and steel industry[J]. Energy Reports, 2023, 9:3057. [8] QIE Y N, LYU Q, LAN C C, ZHANG S H. Energy conservation and CO2 abatement potential of a gas-injection blast furnace[J]. High Temperature Materials and Processes, 2020,39:96. [9] ZHANG C L, VLADISLAV L P, XU R S, et al. Blast furnace hydrogen-rich metallurgy-research on efficiency injection of natural gas and pulverized coal[J]. Fuel, 2022, 311:122412. [10] XU J, WAMG N, CHEN M, et al. Comparative investigation on the reduction behavior of blast furnace dust particles during in-flight process in hydrogen-rich and carbon monoxide atmospheres[J]. Powder Technology, 2020,366:709. [11] 张建良. 氢冶金初探[M]. 北京:冶金工业出版社, 2021.(ZHANG J L. Primary Exploration of Hydrogen Metallurgy[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press,2021.) [12] 世界金属导报. 宝武富氢碳循环氧气高炉关键技术指标实现碳减排阶段性目标[J/OL]. http://www.worldmetals.com.cn/viscms/qiyedongtai0275/20221129/259972.html.[2022-11-29].(World Metals Herald. The phased target of carbon emission reduction of key technical indicators of Baowu oxygen BF with carbon cycle and hydrogen enrichment[J/OL].http://www.worldmetals.com.cn/viscms/giyedongtai0275/20221129/259972.html.[2022-11-29].) [13] 郄亚娜, 王新东, 李宇壮, 等. 冶炼钒钛矿高炉富氢非等温还原行为及合适富氢率的探讨[J]. 钢铁, 2023, 58(8):61.(QIE Y N, WANG X D, LI Y Z, et al. Non-isothermal reduction behavior and appropriate hydrogen enrichment rate of blast furnace with vanadium titanium ore[J]. Iron and Steel, 2023, 58(8):61.) [14] 郭同来. 高炉喷吹焦炉煤气低碳炼铁新工艺基础研究[D]. 沈阳:东北大学, 2015.(GUO T L. Basic Research on New Low Carbon Ironmaking Process of Blast Furnace Injecting Coke Oven Gas[D].Shenyang: Northeast University, 2015.) [15] CUILIU Z, LISTOPADOV V, RUNSHENG X, et al. Blast furnace hydrogen-rich metallurgy-research on efficiency injection of natural gas and pulverized coal[J]. Fuel, 2022, 311:122412 [16] DESAI B, RAMNA R, SATHAYE J. Effect of hot reducing gas (HRG) injection on blast furnace operational parameters: Theoretical investigation[J]. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2008, 35(1): 43. [17] QIE Y N, LYU Q, LI J P, et al. Effect of hydrogen addition on reduction kinetics of iron oxides in gas-injection BF[J]. ISIJ International, 2017, 57:404. [18] KIM J, PARK J K, YOON Y S. Simplified sulfur-iodine cycle process to hydrogen blast furnace: Techno-economic and CO2 mitigation analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 355:131855. [19] CHEN F R, LÜ W, ZHOU G W, et al. Effects of pre-oxidation on the hydrogen-rich reduction of Panzhihua ilmenite concentrate powder: Reduction kinetics and mechanism[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(36):13415. [20] 任贵义. 炼铁学[M]. 北京:冶金工业出版社, 2004.(REN G Y. Ironmaking[M], Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press,2004.) [21] 那树人. 炼铁计算辨析[M]. 北京:冶金工业出版社, 2010.(NA S R. Analysis of Ironmaking Calculations[M], Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press,2010.) [22] 郄亚娜, 李建鹏, 刘小杰, 等. 基于Rist操作线的高炉能耗监测与富氢冶炼预测方法: 中国, 202310207539.3[P]. 2023-05-30.(QIE Y N, LI J P, LIU X J, et al. Energy consumption monitoring and hydrogen-rich smelting prediction method based on Rist operating line: China, 202310207539.3[P]. 2023-05-30.) [23] 朱国海. 高炉富氢还原研究[J]. 钢铁,2020, 55(10):1. (ZHU G H. A review on hydrogen-riched reduction in blast furnace[J]. Iron and Steel, 2020, 55(10):1.) [24] MEGHA J P. Increased Use of Natural Gas in Blast Furnace Iron-making[D].Pittsburgh:Carnegie Mellon University,2016. [25] HUANG D F, ANDRADE M. Optimizations of blast furnace oxygen enrichments[C]//AISTech-iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings.[S.L.]:Association for Iron and Steel Technology, 2017: 78. [26] 张淑会, 邵建男, 毕忠新,等. 钒钛磁铁矿冶炼高炉喷吹焦炉煤气的减排能力[J].钢铁, 2023, 58(2):39.(ZHANG S H, SHAO J N, BI Z X, et al. Emission reduction ability of coke oven gas injection into blast furnace for smelting vanadium titanomagnetite[J]. Iron and Steel, 2023, 58(2):39.) [27] ZHU L, WANG F, ZHANG Z. Thermodynamic evaluation of a conceptual process for coal gasification coupled with chemical looping air separation[J]. Chemical Engineering and Processing Process Intensification, 2016, 106:33. [28] MAJOUMERD M M, HAN R, DE S, et al. Estimation of performance variation of future generation IGCC with coal quality and gasification process-Simulation results of EU H2-IGCC project[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 113(3):452. [29] 耿淑华. 基于改质焦炉煤气直接还原铁矿石的基础研究[D]. 上海:上海大学, 2018.(GENG S H. Fudamental Research on Gas-based Direct Redution of Iron Ore with Reformed Coke Oven Gas[D].Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2018.) [30] MEGHA J, JORGE G, PETRUS C. Increased use of natural gas in blast furnace ironmaking: Mass and energy balance calculations[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2019, 50B:1290. [31] LÜ Q, QIE Y N, LIU X J, et al. Effect of hydrogen addtioon on reduction behavior of iron oxides in gas-injection blast furnace[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2017, 648:79. |
[1] |
DAN Jiayun, YUAN Xiang, ZOU Fanqiu, LI Renguo, XU Kun, NING Xiaojun, WANG Guangwei. Analysis on characteristics of blast furnace mixed injection biochar and coal[J]. Iron and Steel, 2024, 59(2): 55-64. |
[2] |
WEI Rufei1,MENG Dongxiang1,LONG Hongming1,2,GUO Peimin3,LI Kai4,5,LIU Wenbin4,5. Hydrogen reduction characteristics and mechanism of ultrafine iron ore powder under mechanical activation[J]. JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH , 2022, 34(9): 907-915. |
[3] |
FU Xiao-wei, LU Ming, HE Zhi-jun, PANG Qing-hai, YANG Li-chun. Effect of CO2-H2O mixed gas on depth reaction of tamping coke and top charging coke[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(8): 39-49. |
[4] |
LIU Ran, ZHANG Zhi-feng, LIU Xiao-jie, LI Xin, LI Hong-yang, LÜ Qing. Development trend and prospect of low-carbon green ironmaking technology[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(5): 1-10. |
[5] |
WANG Chen, ZHU Ren-liang, WANG Guang-wei. Feasibility analysis of biomass hydrochar injection for blast furnace[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(5): 22-30. |
[6] |
ZHANG Shu-hui, SHAO Jian-nan, LAN Chen-chen, BI Zhong-xin, LÜ Qing. Application status and prospect of biomass energy in ironmaking process[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(12): 13-22. |
|
|
|
|