|
|
Effect of indentation spacing on measured value of Vickers hardness |
ZHOU Siyu, CAI Jing, ZHANG Zhongyuan, ZHANG Hongyang, WANG Jian, ZHANG Jian |
Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China |
|
|
Abstract Vickers hardness test is the most accurate test method in static hardness test. However, in the actual operation of Vickers hardness test, it will be interfered by many factors, thus affecting the experimental results. Several groups of parallel tests for Vickers hardness test on multiple standard plates were conducted using automatic Vickers hardness test equipment. The influence of indentation spacing on the measurement results was analyzed. The uncertainty of tested results was calculated according to GB/T 4340.1-2009. It was found that the larger the indentation spacing was, the smaller the uncertainty was, and more accurate the test result was. Some testing materials were selected to verify the above conclusions. At present, there was a lack of research on the influence of indentation spacing on hardness value.
|
Received: 05 May 2022
|
|
|
|
[1] |
中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 4340.1—2009 金属材料 维氏硬度试验 第1部分:试验方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
|
[2] |
蔡丽清. 维氏硬度试验及其主要影响因素分析[J]. 物理测试,2008,26(5):21.
|
[3] |
韩雨辰,朱文龙,姜传海. 复合喷丸对铝-铜-镁合金表面形貌和硬度的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2021,57(5):6.
|
[4] |
王荷蕾,高原,张涛,等. 动态光散射法测定纳米材料粒度的对比试验[J]. 中国测试,2011,37(6):17.
|
[5] |
徐明. ISO6507 金属材料维氏硬度试验方法的测量不确定度评定实例[J]. 计测技术,2011,31(3):44.
|
[6] |
陈斌,王怀伟,后宗保,等.维氏硬度试验的测量不确定度评定[J]. 物理测试,2020,38(1):58.
|
[7] |
刘云霞,刘晓强,赵鑫,等. 洛氏硬度现场检测与实验室检测对比[J]. 物理测试,2018,36(1):42.
|
[8] |
李自武,沈运杰,叶郁枫. 硬度试验ASTM标准与国内标准的对比分析及应用[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):391.
|
[9] |
夏冰,陈斌,后宗保,等. 维氏硬度计稳定性测试[J]. 物理测试,2021,39(1):37.
|
[10] |
吴伟. 洛氏硬度C标尺测量不确定度的评定[J]. 物理测试,2016,34(4):58.
|
[1] |
QI Yinghao,ZHANG Ke,WANG Yongfeng,ZHAO Jiulai. Analysis on test methods of linear errors for ultrasonic flaw detectors[J]. PHYSICS EXAMINATION AND TESTING, 2022, 40(2): 22-25. |
[2] |
ZHANG Yishuai,WANG Liangjun,SONG Xiaoyong,WANG Qingwen. Analysis of measurement uncertainty of processing dimension of wheel tensile sample [J]. PHYSICS EXAMINATION AND TESTING, 2022, 40(2): 69-71. |
[3] |
GAO Tianyang1,XU Haiwei2,HAN Yun2,TIAN Yaqiang1,LI Hongbin1,CHEN Liansheng1. Investigation of phase transition kinetic equation of DP1180 based on phase transition production[J]. JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH , 2022, 34(10): 1136-1144. |
[4] |
ZHANG Jia, LAI Xiaodan, WU Lamei, LEI Xia. Evaluation of uncertainty of Brinell hardness for nodular cast iron[J]. PHYSICS EXAMINATION AND TESTING, 2022, 40(1): 56-. |
[5] |
HONG Gang,MENG Dewen,JIAN Gejun,SONG Yang,ZHAO Yang. Uncertainty analysis of coaxiality measuring instrument with double extensometers[J]. PHYSICS EXAMINATION AND TESTING, 2021, 39(4): 51-. |
[6] |
SHI Hongyi,CHEN Changhua,HU Jiahao,CHEN Xinhua,LIU Changle. Measurement uncertainty of laboratory testing evaluation method[J]. PHYSICS EXAMINATION AND TESTING, 2021, 39(2): 56-. |
|
|
|
|