GB/T 228.1—2021新版标准变化及其与美标对比分析

doi:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0777.20220031

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (635 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract GB/T 228.1-2021 Metallic Materials-Tensile Testing-Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature was officially implemented on July 1^st, 2022. The main changes between GB/T 228.1-2021 and GB/T 228.1-2010 were compared, and the main differences between GB/T 228.1-2021 and ASTM E8/E8M-21 were summarized. The technical differences of the above standards were compared and analyzed in terms of the scope, nouns and terms, symbols, samples, and size measurement, testing equipment and accuracy, testing requirements and performance measurement, result rounding off and uncertainty in measurement. The results showed that the technical contents of GB/T 228.1-2021 had changed greatly compared with GB/T 228.1-2010, for example, adding two different types of strain rate control modes and the method for measuring the elastic modulus of metal materials by uniaxial tensile test, changing the estimation method of displacement rate of deformation compensation beam of testing machine system, etc. Compared with the above national standards, there were great technical differences between GB/T 228.1-2021 and ASTM E8/E8M-21, so we should be familiar with the relevant provisions during the test. Through the comparison of above standards, it was helpful for standard users to have a deeper understanding and use of relevant standards in actual production, teaching and scientific research.

Key words： tensile test at room temperature GB/T 228.1-2010 GB/T 228.1-2021 ASTM E8/E8M-21 standard comparison

Received: 07 May 2022

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Manyu
	HUO Shubin
	YANG Zaixun
	ZHANG Lei
	HAO Zenglong
	ZHU Houguo

Cite this article:

LIU Manyu,HUO Shubin,YANG Zaixun等. Change of new edition of GB/T 228.1-2021 and its comparison with American standard[J]. PHYSICS EXAMINATION AND TESTING, 2023, 41(2): 59-64.

URL:

http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_wlcs/EN/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0777.20220031 OR http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_wlcs/EN/Y2023/V41/I2/59

[1]	郭淼,陶然,林春来,等. 金属材料拉伸试验标准对比及应用[J]. 物理测试,2013,31(5):57.
[2]	孙宏. ASTM E8/E8M-16ael标准内容的主要变化解析[J]. 焊管,2021,44(4):53.
[3]	国际标准化组织,国际电工委员会. ISO 6892-1:2019 金属材料—拉伸试验—第1部分:室温试验方法[S].国际标准化组织,2019.
[4]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 10623—2008金属材料力学性能试验术语的定义[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[5]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 24182—2009金属力学性能试验出版标准中的符号及定义[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2009.
[6]	李凯,岑风. 机加工对圆棒金属拉伸试样试验结果的影响[J]. 物理测试,2014,32(4):9.
[7]	周志超. 室温拉伸试验断后伸长率测量的探讨[J]. 物理测试,2016,34(2):29.
[8]	ASTM E4-20 试验机的力校准与验证标准规程[S]. 美国:美国材料与试验协会,2020.
[9]	ASTM E83-16 引伸计系统的检定与分级的标准方法[S]. 美国:美国材料与试验协会,2016.
[10]	国家市场监督管理总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 12160—2019金属材料单轴试验用引伸计系统的标定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2019.
[11]	毕格平,杨永林,李俏. 金属材料室温拉伸试验标准方法新旧版本对比分析[J]. 金属热处理,2012,37(6):129.
[12]	徐雁,孙志鹏,宋祖峰. GB/T 228新标准速率控制模式对屈服强度的影响[J]. 物理测试,2021,39(4):5.
[13]	徐庭栋. 金属拉伸试样原始力学性能测量的讨论[J]. 物理测试,2022,40(1):10.
[14]	ASTM A370-21 钢制品机械性能测试的方法和定义[S]. 美国:美国材料与试验协会,2021.
[15]	李颖.承压设备材料试验方法及关键指标的国内外对比研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2014.
[16]	刘波,黄晓艳,赵尚. 2010版金属材料室温拉伸实验标准的变化[J]. 上海金属,2013,35(1):46.
[17]	巫钢. 金属材料拉伸试验测量不确定度的分析[J]. 测试技术学报,2014,28(5):405.
[18]	刘增良,张玲,陈文阁. 金属试件拉伸强度试验测量不确定度的评定[J]. 山东建筑大学学报,2007,22(4):373.