核电用316H不锈钢板蠕变性能测试影响因素探讨

doi:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0777.20220079

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (4)

Download: PDF (2311 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The upgrading of steel for thermal power plant and nuclear power plant equipment puts forward higher requirements for the evaluation of high-temperature service performance of heat-resistant steel. Therefore, the accurate and reliable data in creep test are particularly important. In this study, 316H stainless steel plate for nuclear power was selected as the research object. The influence of sampling position, sampling size and equipment difference on creep test results was discussed through a series of high temperature creep tests. Affected by the production process, the creep resistance of the material in the middle (1/2 position) of the 316H stainless steel plate was significantly different from that in the surface (1/4 position or 3/4 position), and the total creep strain of the material in the middle was 44% lower than that of the upper material, indicating that the sampling position had a great impact on the creep test results of stainless-steel plate. The creep test results of the sample with parallel section diameter of 10 mm and the sample with parallel section diameter of 5 mm had little difference, and the total creep strain difference was about 11%, indicating that the specimen size had little influence on the creep test results. Affected by the equipment difference, the creep test results of samples with the same sampling position and specimen size had little difference. The relative standard deviation of the total creep strain tested by 30 creep testing machines was about 9.5%, indicating that the equipment difference had little impact on the creep test results of stainless-steel plates. When the equipment calibration was qualified, the influence of the equipment difference on the creep test results could be ignored.

Key words： nuclear power for 316H creep test equipment difference

Received: 21 December 2022

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Bing
	ZANG Haoliang
	REN Gaofei
	WANG Shimin
	ZHAO Lantao

Cite this article:

YANG Bing,ZANG Haoliang,REN Gaofei等. Discussion about influencing factors in creep test of 316H stainless steel plate for nuclear power[J]. PHYSICS EXAMINATION AND TESTING, 2023, 41(6): 6-10.

URL:

http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_wlcs/EN/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn1001-0777.20220079 OR http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_wlcs/EN/Y2023/V41/I6/6

[1]	来张翼,周冶东,方健. 持久蠕变试验技术在宝钢的发展及应用[J]. 物理测试,2017,35(4):47.
[2]	李智,莫亚飞,高付海,等. ASME规范316H不锈钢高温蠕变本构方程解析与讨论[J]. 原子能科学技术,2023,57(2):412.
[3]	陈乐,何琨,梁波,等. 316不锈钢室温和350 ℃低周疲劳性能研究[J]. 核动力工程,2017,38(3):51.
[4]	尹嵬,梁伟. 热处理工艺对316H不锈钢中厚板力学性能影响研究[J]. 特殊钢,2019,40(1):60.
[5]	Sawada K, Kimura K, Abe F, et al. Catalog of NIMS creep data sheets[J]. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 2019, 20(1): 1131.
[6]	范志超,Smith D J,陈学东,等. 前期循环加载历史对316H不锈钢蠕变变形的影响研究及其寿命预测[C]//中国机械工程学会压力容器分会第七届压力容器及管道使用管理学术会议暨使用管理委员会七届二次会议论文集. 威海:中国机械工程学会,2011:42.
[7]	姜恒,江慧丰,范志超,等. 保载应力和加载速率对316H不锈钢蠕变行为的影响[J]. 压力容器,2011,28(8):6.
[8]	许峰,陈前,金传伟,等. 热处理冷却速率对热轧316L不锈钢显微组织演变的影响[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程,2022,51(4):1406.