Solidification modes and delta-ferrite of two types of 316L stainless steels: a combination of as-cast microstructure and HT-CLSM research

Yang Wang, Chao Chen, Xiao-yu Yang, Zheng-rui Zhang, Jian Wang, Zhou Li, Lei Chen, Wang-zhong Mu

钢铁研究学报(英文版) ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2) : 426-436.

PDF(2229 KB)
欢迎访问《钢铁研究学报(英文版)》官方网站!今天是 2025年7月31日 星期四
PDF(2229 KB)
钢铁研究学报(英文版) ›› 2025, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2) : 426-436. DOI: 10.1007/s42243-024-01401-4
ORIGINAL PAPERS

Solidification modes and delta-ferrite of two types of 316L stainless steels: a combination of as-cast microstructure and HT-CLSM research

  • Yang Wang1, Chao Chen1, Xiao-yu Yang2, Zheng-rui Zhang1, Jian Wang1, Zhou Li3, Lei Chen4, Wang-zhong Mu2,5
作者信息 +

Solidification modes and delta-ferrite of two types of 316L stainless steels: a combination of as-cast microstructure and HT-CLSM research

  • Yang Wang1, Chao Chen1, Xiao-yu Yang2, Zheng-rui Zhang1, Jian Wang1, Zhou Li3, Lei Chen4, Wang-zhong Mu2,5
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

In 316L austenitic stainless steel, the presence of ferrite phase severely affects the non-magnetic properties. 316L austenitic stainless steel with low-alloy type (L-316L) and high-alloy type (H-316L) has been studied. The microstructure and solidification kinetics of the two as-cast grades were in situ observed by high temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy (HT-CLSM). There are significant differences in the as-cast microstructures of the two 316L stainless steel compositions. In L-316L steel, ferrite morphology appears as the short rods with a ferrite content of 6.98%, forming a dualphase microstructure consisting of austenite and ferrite. Conversely, in H-316L steel, the ferrite appears as discontinuous network structures with a content of 4.41%, forming a microstructure composed of austenite and sigma (σ) phase. The alloying elements in H-316L steel exhibit a complex distribution, with Ni and Mo enriching at the austenite grain boundaries. HT-CLSM experiments provide the real-time observation of the solidification processes of both 316L specimens and reveal distinct solidification modes: L-316L steel solidifies in an FA mode, whereas H-316L steel solidifies in an AF mode. These differences result in ferrite and austenite predominantly serving as the nucleation and growth phases, respectively. The solidification mode observed by experiments is similar to the thermodynamic calculation results. The L-316L steel solidified in the FA mode and showed minimal element segregation, which lead to a direct transformation of ferrite to austenite phase (δ → λ) during phase transformation after solidification. Besides, the H-316L steel solidified in the AF mode and showed severe element segregation, which lead to Mo enrichment at grain boundaries and transformation of ferrite into sigma and austenite phases through the eutectoid reaction (δ → σ + λ).

Abstract

In 316L austenitic stainless steel, the presence of ferrite phase severely affects the non-magnetic properties. 316L austenitic stainless steel with low-alloy type (L-316L) and high-alloy type (H-316L) has been studied. The microstructure and solidification kinetics of the two as-cast grades were in situ observed by high temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy (HT-CLSM). There are significant differences in the as-cast microstructures of the two 316L stainless steel compositions. In L-316L steel, ferrite morphology appears as the short rods with a ferrite content of 6.98%, forming a dualphase microstructure consisting of austenite and ferrite. Conversely, in H-316L steel, the ferrite appears as discontinuous network structures with a content of 4.41%, forming a microstructure composed of austenite and sigma (σ) phase. The alloying elements in H-316L steel exhibit a complex distribution, with Ni and Mo enriching at the austenite grain boundaries. HT-CLSM experiments provide the real-time observation of the solidification processes of both 316L specimens and reveal distinct solidification modes: L-316L steel solidifies in an FA mode, whereas H-316L steel solidifies in an AF mode. These differences result in ferrite and austenite predominantly serving as the nucleation and growth phases, respectively. The solidification mode observed by experiments is similar to the thermodynamic calculation results. The L-316L steel solidified in the FA mode and showed minimal element segregation, which lead to a direct transformation of ferrite to austenite phase (δ → λ) during phase transformation after solidification. Besides, the H-316L steel solidified in the AF mode and showed severe element segregation, which lead to Mo enrichment at grain boundaries and transformation of ferrite into sigma and austenite phases through the eutectoid reaction (δ → σ + λ).

关键词

316L austenitic stainless steel / As-cast microstructure / High-temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy / Solidification mode / Ferrite / Characterization

Key words

316L austenitic stainless steel / As-cast microstructure / High-temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy / Solidification mode / Ferrite / Characterization

图表

引用本文

导出引用
Yang Wang, Chao Chen, Xiao-yu Yang, . Solidification modes and delta-ferrite of two types of 316L stainless steels: a combination of as-cast microstructure and HT-CLSM research[J]. 钢铁研究学报(英文版), 2025, 32(2): 426-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-024-01401-4
Yang Wang, Chao Chen, Xiao-yu Yang, et al. Solidification modes and delta-ferrite of two types of 316L stainless steels: a combination of as-cast microstructure and HT-CLSM research[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2025, 32(2): 426-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-024-01401-4

参考文献

[1] C.S. Liu, F.K. Li, H. Zhang, J. Li, Y. Wang, Y.Y. Lu, L. Xiong, H.W. Ni, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 30 (2023) 1511-1523.
[2] T.H. Wang, J. Wang, J.G. Bai, S.J. Wang, C. Chen, P.D. Han, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 29 (2022) 1012-1025.
[3] C. Hou, L. Xue, J. Li, W. Ma, J. Wang, Y. Dai, C. Chen, J. Dang, Acta Mater. 277 (2024) 120176.
[4] A.F. Ciuffini, F. Di Giovanni, D. Mombelli, La Metall. Ital. 59 (2022) 59-68.
[5] Z. Hou, G. Cheng, C. Wu, C. Chen, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 43 (2012) 1517-1529.
[6] E.M.F. de Souza Silva, G.S. da Fonseca, E.A. Ferreira, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 15 (2021) 4317-4329.
[7] K. Kadoi, S. Ueno, H. Inoue, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 25 (2023) 1314-1321.
[8] H.Y. Chu, R.K. Shiue, S.Y. Cheng, Materials 17 (2023) 232.
[9] X. Li, F. Gao, J. Jiao, G. Cao, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, Mater. Charact. 174 (2021) 111029.
[10] H. Inoue, T. Koseki, Acta Mater. 124 (2017) 430-436.
[11] X.F. Zhang, H. Terasaki, Y. Komizo, Philos. Mag. Lett. 91 (2011) 491-497.
[12] C. Chen, G. Cheng, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 48 (2017) 2324-2333.
[13] F.A.M. dos Santos, M.A. Martorano, A.F. Padilha, REM Int. Eng. J. 76 (2023) 47-54.
[14] E.J. Chun, H. Baba, K. Nishimoto, K. Saida, Mater. Charact. 86 (2013) 152-166.
[15] C. Wu, S. Li, C. Zhang, X. Wang, J. Mater. Sci. 51 (2016) 2529-2539.
[16] Z. Wang, F. Gao, G. Cao, S. Tang, Z. Liu, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 53 (2022) 2652-2664.
[17] J.C. Ma, Y.S. Yang, W.H. Tong, Y. Fang, Y. Yu, Z.Q. Hu, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 444 (2007) 64-68.
[18] R. Zhai, H. Zhang, B. Xu, S. Liu, B. Xie, M. Sun, Cryogenics 126 (2022) 103522.
[19] Y. Wang, Q. Wang, W. Mu, Metals 13 (2023) 517.
[20] Y. Wang, W. Mu, Crystals 13 (2023) 1114.
[21] Y. Wang, S. Sukenaga, H. Shibata, Q. Wang, W. Mu, Steel Res. Int. 94 (2023) 2200960.
[22] Y. Zhang, D. Zou, X. Wang, Y. Li, M. Li, F. Wang, W. Zhang, L. Tong, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 18 (2022) 3104-3114.
[23] Y. Li, D. Zou, M. Li, L. Tong, Y. Zhang, W. Zhang, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 54 (2023) 3497-3507.
[24] Z. Liu, J. Wang, C. Chen, H. Tian, P. Han, Steel Res. Int. 95 (2024) 2400050.
[25] F.X. Huang, X.H. Wang, J.M. Zhang, C.X. Ji, Y. Fang, Y. Yu, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 15 (2008) 78-82.
[26] J. Niagaj, Ł. Mazur, Weld. Int. 28 (2014) 345-353.
[27] Y. Wang, L. Chen, W.Z. Mu, Z.R. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Chen, Iron and Steel 59 (2024) No. 5, 80-91.
[28] C. Cicutti, R. Boeri, Scripta Mater. 45 (2001) 1455-1460.

PDF(2229 KB)

18

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/