MgO对高碱度高铝烧结矿的影响

doi:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn0449-749x.20200357

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1830 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要随着钢铁企业高铝铁矿粉使用比例的提高,带来了高炉炉渣黏度增大、渣铁分离困难等一系列问题。采用烧结杯试验,研究了MgO含量增加对高碱度高铝烧结矿经济技术指标、冷强度和冶金性能的影响,采用Nova400 NanoSEM型场发射扫描电子显微镜分析了烧结矿微观结构。试验结果表明,高碱度高铝烧结矿中MgO质量分数从1.72%提高到2.49%时,垂直烧结速度降低4.38 mm/min,利用系数降低0.51 t/(m²·h),低温还原粉化指数增加6.7%;当烧结矿中MgO质量分数为2.11%时,转鼓指数和还原度最高,分别达到61.93%和86.39%;Mg²⁺主要固溶在磁铁矿晶格中并替代Fe²⁺,替代的质量分数最高达3.64%,生成的含镁磁铁矿抑制烧结矿降温过程中由Fe₃O₄→Fe₂O₃氧化过程的相变,减少了二次赤铁矿的生成,有利于改善烧结矿的低温还原粉化性能。研究结果可以为改善高碱度高铝烧结矿性能和提高炉渣流动性提供理论指导和参考依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	易正明
	覃佳卓
	姜志伟
	秦庆伟
	邵慧君
	杜东

关键词 ：高铝烧结矿, 高碱度烧结矿, MgO, 冶金性能, 微观结构

Abstract：The increase of the proportion of high Al₂O₃ content iron ore fine in iron and steel enterprises has brought about a series of problems such as the increase of the viscosity of blast furnace slag and the difficulty of the separation of slag and iron. The effect of increasing MgO content on the technical and economic index, the cold strength, and metallurgical properties of high basicity and high alumina sinter was studied through the sinter pot test. Nova400 NanoSEM field emission scanning electron microscope was used to analyze the microstructure of the sinter. The experimental results show that when the mass percent of MgO in the sinter with high alkalinity and high aluminum increases from 1.72% to 2.49%, the vertical sintering speed decreases by 4.38 mm/min, the utilization coefficient decreases by 0.51 t/(m²·h), and the low-temperature reduction degradation index increases by 6.7%. When the mass percent of MgO in the sinter is 2.11%, the drum index and the reducibility index are the highest, reaching 61.93% and 86.39% respectively. Mg²⁺ is mainly solid dissolved in the magnetite lattice and replaces Fe²⁺, and the mass fraction of the replacement reaches up to 3.64%. The generated magnesium-containing magnetite inhibits the phase transition from Fe₃O₄ to Fe₂O₃ oxidation process in the sinter cooling process, which reduces the generation of secondary hematite and is conducive to improving the low-temperature reduction degradation performance of the sinter. The research results can provide theoretical guidance and reference for improving the properties of high-basicity and high-alumina sinter and adjusting the fluidity of blast furnace slag.

Key words： high-alumina sinter high-basicity sinter MgO metallurgical property microstructure

收稿日期: 2020-07-13

引用本文:

易正明, 覃佳卓, 姜志伟, 秦庆伟, 邵慧君, 杜东. MgO对高碱度高铝烧结矿的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2021, 56(2): 50-56. YI Zheng-ming, QIN Jia-zhuo, JIANG Zhi-wei, QIN Qing-wei, SHAO Hui-jun, DU Dong. Influence of MgO on high basicity high alumina sinter[J]. Iron and Steel, 2021, 56(2): 50-56.

链接本文:

http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_gt/CN/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn0449-749x.20200357 或 http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_gt/CN/Y2021/V56/I2/50

[1] 杜亮, 韩秀丽, 张全胜, 等. 外矿型烧结矿矿相结构与冶金性能的定量关系[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(6): 38.(DU Liang, HAN Xiu-li, ZHANG Quan-sheng, et al. Quantitative relation between mineralogical structure and metallurgical properties of sinter of import iron ore [J]. Iron and Steel, 2020, 55(6): 38.)
[2] 胡长庆, 韩涛, 师学峰. 含铝铁酸钙CFA的生成行为[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(8): 70.(HU Chang-qing, HAN Tao, SHI Xue-feng. Formation behavior of calcium ferrite containing aluminum[J]. Iron and Steel, 2020, 55(8): 70.)
[3] 张汉泉. 烧结球团理论与工艺[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2015.(ZHANG Hai-quan. Theory and Technology of Sintering and Pelletizing[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press,2015.)
[4] 公言国, 王广, 李华, 等. 高铝烧结矿中MgO的影响研究[J]. 矿冶工程, 2015, 35(1): 76.(GONG Yan-guo, WANG Guang, LI Hua, et al. Study on the influence of MgO on high-alumina sinter [J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, 2015, 35(1): 76.)
[5] 杨福. MgO含量对高铝烧结矿冶金性能的影响[J]. 云南冶金, 2015, 44(3): 37.(YANG Fu. The effect of MgO content in the metallurgical performance of high-alumina sintered ore[J]. Yunnan Metallurgy, 2015, 44(3): 37.)
[6] 杨福, 吴志清, 程建文, 等. w(MgO)含量对高炉高铝渣高温性能的影响[J]. 钢铁研究, 2011, 39(1): 4.(YANG Fu, WU Zhi-qing, CHENG Jian-wen, et al. Effect of w(MgO) on high temperature properties of high alumina blast furnace slag[J]. Research on Iron and Steel, 2011, 39(1): 4.)
[7] 苏立新, 吴胜利, 翟晓波, 等. 巴西某高硅铁矿粉对烧结黏结相流动性及劣质矿物的影响[J]. 中国冶金, 2020, 30(1): 18.(SU Li-xin, WU Sheng-li, ZHAI Xiao-bo, et al. Effect of high-silica iron ore from Brazil on fluidity and inferior minerals of sintered binding phase[J]. China Metallurgy, 2020, 30(1): 18.)
[8] Panigrahy S C, Verstraeten P, Dilewijns J. Influence of MgO addition on mineralogy of iron ore sinter[J]. Metallurgical Transactions, 1984, 15B(1): 23.
[9] Srinivas Dwarapudi, Tamal K Ghosh, Vilas Tathavadkar,et al. Effect of MgO in the form of magnesite on the quality and microstructure of hematite pellets[J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2012, 112: 55.
[10] ZHU De-qing, CHUN Tie-jun, PAN Jian, et al. Influence of basicity and MgO content on metallurgical performances of Brazilian specularite pellets[J]. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2013, 125: 51.
[11] 郭玉峰郭兴敏. MgO对赤铁矿粉矿烧结产物低温还原过程的影响[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2017, 29(9): 697.(GUO Yu-feng, GUO Xing-min. Effect of MgO on low temperature reduction process of hematite fines sinter[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2017, 29(9): 697.)
[12] 姜鑫, 吴钢生, 魏国, 等. MgO对烧结工艺及烧结矿冶金性能的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2006, 41(3): 8.(JIANG Xin, WU Gang-sheng, WEI Guo, et al. Effect of MgO on sintering process and metallurgical properties of sinter[J]. Iron and Steel, 2006, 41(3): 8.)
[13] 王煜, 何志军, 湛文龙, 等. 富氢气氛下不同含铁炉料的还原行为[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(7): 34.(WANG Yu, HE Zhi-jun, ZHAN Wen-long, et al.Reduction behavior of iron-bearing burdens in hydrogen-rich stream[J]. Iron and Steel, 2020, 55(7): 34.)
[14] 吴胜利, 韩宏亮, 姜伟忠, 等. 烧结矿中MgO作用机理[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2009, 31(4): 428.(WU Sheng-li, HAN Hong-liang, JIANG Wei-zhong, et al. MgO interaction mechanism in sinter[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2009, 31(4), 428.)
[15] 范晓慧, 李文琦, 甘敏, 等. MgO对高碱度烧结矿强度的影响及机理[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 43(9): 3325.(FAN Xiao-hui, LI Wen-qi, GAN Min, et al. Influence and mechanism of MgO on strength of high basicity sinter[J]. Journal of Central South University(Natural Science), 2012, 43(9): 3325.)
[16] 宋鹤锴, 吴胜利, 阙志刚, 等. 赤铁精粉配比对烧结矿强度的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2019, 54(1): 8.(SONG He-kai, WU Sheng-li, QUE Zhi-gang, et al.Effect of ratio of hematite concentrate on strength of sinter[J]. Iron and Steel, 2019, 54(1): 8.)
[17] 陈绍国, 裴元东, 王同宾,等. 首钢京唐降低烧结矿SiO₂含量的研究及应用[J]. 中国冶金, 2018, 28(2): 39.(CHEN Shao-guo, PEI Yuan-dong, WANG Tong-bin, et al. Researh and application on reducing SiO₂ content in sinter in Shougang Jingtang[J]. China Metallurgy, 2018, 28(2): 39.)
[18] 刘新亮, HONEYANDS Tom, O'DEA Damien, 等. 软熔过程中烧结矿和块矿的交互作用[J]. 钢铁, 2019, 54(12): 19.(LIU Xin-liang, HONEYANDS Tom, O'DEA Damien, et al. Interaction between sinter and lump during softening and melting process[J]. Iron and Steel, 2019, 54(12): 19.)
[19] Miyuki Hayashi, Hiroki Tanaka, Takashi Watanabe,e tal. Role of MgO in sinter from perspective of MgO distribution between liquid and magnetite phases in FeO_x-CaO-SiO₂-MgO system[J]. ISIJ International, 2017, 57(12): 2214.
[20] 杨楠, 郭兴敏. MgO对烧结矿CaO-Fe₂O₃系初期液相生成的影响[J]. 中国冶金, 2019, 29(5): 22.(YANG Nan, GUO Xing-min. Effect of MgO on formation of CaO-Fe₂O₃ based initial liquid phase in iron ore sinter[J]. China Metallurgy, 2019, 29(5): 22.)
[21] 郭玉峰, 郭兴敏. MgO对铁矿石烧结过程中二次赤铁矿形成的影响[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2017, 29(3): 185.(GUO Yu-feng, GUO Xing-min. Effect of MgO on formation of secondary hematite in sintering process of iron ores[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2017, 29(3): 185.)
[22] 陈耀铭, 陈锐. 烧结球团矿微观结构[M]. 长沙: 中南大学出版社, 2011.(CHEN Yao-mimg, CHEN Rui. Microstructure of Sinter and Pellet[M]. Changsha: Central South University Press, 2011.)
[23] 陈平. 结晶矿物学[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2006. (CHEN Ping. Crystal Mineralogy[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006.)
[24] 田硕, 王艺慈, 罗果萍, 等. 某钢厂常用4种铁矿粉烧结基础特性[J]. 中国冶金, 2020, 30(4): 12.(TIAN Shuo, WANG Yi-ci, LUO Guo-ping, et al. Basic characteristics of four iron ore fines commonly used in steel plants[J]. China Metallurgy, 2020, 30(4): 12.)
[25] 何占伟, 薛向欣. 典型钒钛磁铁矿的烧结基础特性[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(5): 20.(HE Zhan-wei, XUE Xiang-xin.Basic sintering characteristics of several typical vanadium titanium magnetite[J]. Iron and Steel, 2020, 55(5): 20.)