|
|
Analysis of longitudinal cracks and optimization of mold flux for peritectic steel slab |
LI Yu-di1, ZHANG Fa-bin2 |
1. Technology Center, Shanghai Meishan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210039, Jiangsu, China; 2. Steelmaking Plant, Shanghai Meishan Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210039, Jiangsu, China |
|
|
Abstract In the production of Q235B、Q345B peritectic steel slabs, a variety of surface longitudinal cracks defects were found. According to the analysis of macroscopic morphology, metallurgical structure and microscopic morphology, it is confirmed that the surface longitudinal cracks are formed in the mold, the basic reason is the uneven growth of the composite shell in the mold caused by the volume shrinkage during the transformation from δ to γ phase, and the mold flux is the key factor. In order to reduce the heat transfer from the slab to the mold, the existing mold flux was optimized. The basicity of mold flux was increased from 1.39 to 1.53, and the crystallization property of mold flux was improved to enhance the slow cooling of molten steel at meniscus. At the same time, the melting temperature is reduced from 1 171 to 1 130 ℃, and the viscosity is kept at 0.08 Pa·s at 1 300 ℃, this can ensure the consumption of mold flux to ensure the lubrication of the billet. The production practice shows that the surface quality of the slab is improved obviously by using the optimized mold flux, and the proportion of longitudinal cracks is reduced from 10.58% to 1.85%.
|
Received: 26 December 2020
|
|
|
|
[1] |
刘志远,霍俊梅,王重君,等. 唐钢中厚板厂连铸保护渣结晶器渣膜矿相分析[J]. 中国冶金, 2017, 27(12): 22.
|
[2] |
孙明翰, 朱志旺, 郑立康,等. 铸轧薄带的边部斜裂纹形成机理[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(4): 60.
|
[3] |
艾克南, 张盼盼, 赵梦豪, 等. 1215易切削钢拉拔表面裂纹形成机制分析[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(2): 88.
|
[4] |
肖鹏程,朱立光,王杏娟,等.高强汽车板连铸坯纵裂分析与保护渣优化[J]. 炼钢,2017,33(3):56.
|
[5] |
杨春宝,王宝动,裴培.TRIP590热轧卷表面裂纹形成原因及保护渣优化研究[J]. 炼钢,2017,33(3):78.
|
[6] |
曹磊.包晶钢连铸坯表面纵裂与保护渣性能选择[J]. 钢铁,2015,50(2):38.
|
[7] |
张瑜,漆鑫,杨春雷,等.Q235B热轧板表面纵裂成因分析及工艺控制[J]. 特殊钢,2016,37(1):29.
|
[8] |
姚书芳.天钢连铸板坯表面纵裂产生原因的分析及对策[J]. 钢铁研究学报,2010,22(4):24.
|
[9] |
朱立光, 张晓仕, 王杏娟, 等. 高钛焊丝钢CaO-Al2O3基专用保护渣熔化特性分析[J]. 中国冶金, 2020, 30(10): 9.
|
[10] |
刘克, 韩毅华, 杨帆, 等. MgO对CaO-Al2O3基四元系保护渣熔渣微结构的影响[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(5): 52.
|
[11] |
朱立光, 袁志鹏, 肖鹏程, 等. 低碳钢薄板坯高速连铸保护渣研究与优化[J]. 钢铁, 2020, 55(11): 65.
|
[12] |
翁建军.高碱度高润滑性连铸保护渣的研究和应用[J]. 炼钢,2016,32(1):52.
|
[13] |
迟景灏,甘永年.连铸保护渣[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,1992.
|
[14] |
孙丽枫,宋智芳,刘承军,等.连铸结晶器保护渣结晶性能的研究[J]. 特殊钢,2007,28(2):34.
|
[15] |
朱立光,袁志鹏,肖鹏程,等.高拉速薄板坯连铸中碳钢保护渣开发与应用[J]. 连铸,2020(1):51.
|
[16] |
沈铁.碱度对CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-CaF2-Na2O保护渣结晶性能的影响[J]. 金属锻焊技术,2010,39(21):38.
|
[17] |
王杏娟,田阔,朱立光,等.裂纹敏感性钢连铸保护渣应用研究[J]. 钢铁钒钛,2018,39(2):121.
|
[18] |
王杏娟,樊亚鹏,朱立光,等.碱度对连铸保护渣结晶率的影响[J]. 特殊钢,2017,38(2):6.
|
[19] |
赵和明,潘新红,袁静.保护渣碱度对薄板坯结晶器平均热流的影响[J]. 连铸,2016(3):23.
|
[20] |
刘承军,朱英雄,姜茂发,等.连铸保护渣的熔化温度、凝固温度和结晶温度研究[J]. 炼钢,2001,17(1):43
|
[1] |
ZHAO Xianjiu1,2,ZHANG Jieyu2,3,LI Chuanjun2,3. Analysis of formation mechanism about Ca-Mg-Al spineltype inclusions in cold thin rolling sheet[J]. JOURNAL OF IRON AND STEEL RESEARCH , 2022, 34(7): 664-671. |
[2] |
CHEN Bin, LI Hai-bo, JI Chen-xi, LIU Guo-liang, ZHOU Hai-chen. Influence of casting parameters on level fluctuations and its industrial application[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(7): 86-94. |
[3] |
KANG Yong-lin, ZHU Guo-ming, JIANG Min, WANG Guo-lian, LIU Peng-tao, XU Hai-wei, XIE Cui-hong, WEI Yun-fei, SHEN Kai-zhao, LIU Yang. Slab continuous casting by big roll heavy reduction and extra thick plate rolled by low compression ratio[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(7): 95-105. |
[4] |
WANG Xu-feng, WANG Qiang-qiang, ZHANG Xu-bin, WANG Qian, HE Sheng-ping. Effect of AlN on properties of CaO-SiO2 based mold fluxes for high-Al steel[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(5): 64-71. |
[5] |
YAN Xiao-peng, LIU Lei, HAN Xiu-li, WANG Yin-hui, ZHANG Di. Effect of boron on microstructure of fluorine-free mold fluxes[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(5): 72-80. |
[6] |
YANG Tao, LONG Hong-ming, DING Cheng-yi, LI Yong, CAO Fa-wei, HU Ming-yi. Effect of w(Al2O3)/w(SiO2) on sintered ore mineralization characteristics and metallurgical properties[J]. Iron and Steel, 2022, 57(4): 43-51. |
|
|
|
|