含钛高碱度烧结矿软熔成渣行为

兰 东,李廷乐,孙长余,汪 琦,

钢铁 ›› 2018, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9) : 7-13.

PDF(2143 KB)
欢迎访问《钢铁》官方网站!今天是 2025年7月28日 星期一
PDF(2143 KB)
钢铁 ›› 2018, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (9) : 7-13. DOI: 10.13228/j.boyuan.issn0449-749x.20170619
原料与炼铁

含钛高碱度烧结矿软熔成渣行为

  • 兰 东1,2,李廷乐1,2,孙长余1,2,汪 琦1,2
作者信息 +

Slag evolution of Ti-bearing high basicity sinter during softening-melting process

  • 兰 东1,2,李廷乐1,2,孙长余1,2,汪 琦1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

通常认为含钛烧结矿铁品位低、成分和矿相复杂,与普通烧结矿相比更加难以在高炉中冶炼。然而实际生产中,冶炼含钛烧结矿的高炉利用系数并不低,原因是其软熔成渣行为与普通烧结矿具有很大差异性。为弄清差异产生的原因、解析含钛烧结矿在高炉中的熔炼情况,通过测定现场含钛烧结矿的软熔性能,并利用扫描电镜和X射线衍射分析熔滴特征温度下中断试样的微观结构和矿相组成,阐明其在软熔过程中的成渣特点。结果表明,含钛烧结矿软熔温度较低,最大压差为547 kPa,低于典型的普通高碱度烧结矿。软熔过程渣中矿相主要为FeO、黄长石和钙钛矿,共晶温度低是软熔温度较低的主要原因。压差曲线表现出二次陡升特点,这是渣相熔化温度与金属铁熔点相差过大造成的。

Abstract

It is generally accepted that Ti-bearing sinter is more difficult to smelting in blast furnace process than common sinter because of its low content of Fe, complex compositions and mineral phase. However, the blast furnace coefficient in smelting Ti-bearing sinter is not inferior to that of some common sinter in practical production which may result from the difference of the slag evolution between Ti-bearing sinter and common sinter. In order to clarify the reasons for the difference and analyze the performance of Ti-bearing sinter in BF, the softening-melting property of Ti-bearing sinter was test firstly. Then samples interrupted at the softening-melting characteristic temperature were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction in order to clarify the slag evolution of Ti-bearing high basicity sinter during softening-melting process. The results show that softening-melting temperature of Ti-bearing sinter was lower, the max pressure drop was 547 kPa which was lower than common sinter with the same basicity. In softening-melting process, the mineral phase of slag contained FeO, melitite and proviskite and the kinds of mineral phase of slag were unchanged. The main reason for low softening and melting temperature of Ti-bearing sinter was low eutectic temperature of the slag. The pressure drop curverised twice in softening-melting process which may resulted from the large difference of melting temperature between slag and metal.

关键词

含钛高碱度烧结矿 / 软熔性能 / 成渣行为 / 压差

Key words

Ti-bearing high basicity sinter / softening-melting property / slag evolution / pressure drop

图表

引用本文

导出引用
兰 东,李廷乐,孙长余,汪 琦,. 含钛高碱度烧结矿软熔成渣行为[J]. 钢铁, 2018, 53(9): 7-13 https://doi.org/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn0449-749x.20170619
LAN Dong,,LI Ting-le,,SUN Chang-yu,,WANG Qi,. Slag evolution of Ti-bearing high basicity sinter during softening-melting process[J]. Iron and Steel, 2018, 53(9): 7-13 https://doi.org/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn0449-749x.20170619

参考文献

[1]吕 庆, 王福佳, 李豪杰.宣钢高炉合理炉料结构熔滴试验[J].钢铁, 2016, 51(6):19-25
[2]Lü Qing, WANG Fu-jia, LI Hao-jie.Rational burden structure by droplet test in Xuansteel blast furnace[J].Iron and Steel, 2016, 51(6):19-25
[3]LIU ZG, CHU MS and WANG HT.Effect of MgO content in sinter on softening-melting behavior of mixed burden made form chromium-bearing vanadium-titanium magnetite[J].International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2016, 23(1):25-32
[4]Matsumura M, Hoshi M and Kawaguchi T.Improvement of sinter softening property and reducibility by controlling chemical compositions[J].ISIJ international, 2005, 45(4):594-602
[5]王海涛, 李光辉, 范晓慧等.几种高炉炉料冶金性能的对比研究[J].钢铁, 2006, 41(1):23-27
[6]WANG Hai-tao, LI Guang-hui, FAN Xiao-hui, et al.Comparative study on metallurgical properties of blast furnace burdens[J].Iron and Steel, 2006, 41(1):23-27
[7]刁日陞.钒钛矿与普通矿在高炉各带行为差异的研究[J].钢铁, 1996, 31(2):12-17
[8]DIAO Ri-sheng.Difference in behaviours of V-Ti bearing and common iron ores within blast furnace[J].Iron and Steel, 1996, 31(2):12-17
[9]甘勤, 何群, 黎建明, 等.比值及辅料对钒钛烧结矿软熔滴落性能的影响[J].钢铁, 2000, 35(4):1-4
[10]GAN Qin, HE Qun, LI Jian-ming, et al.Impact of SiO2TiO2 ratio and addition of auxiliary materials on softening dropping of V-bearing titaniferous magnetite sinter[J].Iron and Steel, 2000, 35(4):1-4
[11]何木光.对高钛钒钛磁铁烧结矿性能的影响[J].钢铁, 2016, 51(5):9-16
[12]HE Mu-guang.Effect of W(TiO2)on sintering properties of high titanium vanadium-titanium magnetite[J].Iron and Steel, 2016, 51(5):9-16
[13] 姜 汀.承钢含钒钛烧结矿的熔滴试验[J].河北冶金, 2012, (12):13-16
[14]JIANG Ting.Droplet test of sinter bearing vanadium and titanium[J].Heibei metallurgy, 2012, (12):13-16
[15] 王挽平, 姜汀, 卢军等.怎样做好含钒钛烧结矿的熔滴试验[J].北方钒钛, 2012, (4):3-6
[16]WANG Wan-ping, JIANG Ting, LU Jun, et al.How to test the droplet property of V-bearing titaniferous magnetite sinter[J].North vanadium titanium, 2012, (4):3-6
[17] 沐继尧, 毕学工, 席更学.熔滴实验结果鉴定指标的探讨[J].炼铁, 1985, (6): 40-44.
[18]MU Ji-rao, BI Xue-gong, XI Geng-xue.The discussion on index of droplet text[J]. Iron making, 1985, (6): 40-44.
[19] Li TL, Sun CY, Liu XY, et al.The effects of MgO and Al2O3 behaviours on softening melting properties of high basicity sinter
[20]刘 然, 刘朝卿, 刘小杰等.钙钛矿含量对钒钛磁铁矿烧结性能的影响[J].过程工程学报, 2015, 15(1):62-67
[21]LIU Ran, LIU Chao-qing, LIU Xiao-jie.Effect of perovskite content on sintering properties of high titanium vanadium-titanium magnetite[J]The Chinese journal of process engineering, 2015, 15(1): 62-67.
[22]甘 勤, 何 群, 文永才.对钒钛烧结矿产质量的影响[J].钢铁钒钛, 2008, 29(1):54-60
[23]GAN Qin, HE Qun, WEN Yong-cai.Effect of MgO on the quality of vanadium-titanium magnetite sinter[J].Iron steel vanadium titanium, 2008, 29(1):54-60
[24]甘 勤, 何 群, 黎建明等.在钒钛烧结矿中的行为研究[J].钢铁, 2013, 38(1):1-4
[25]GAN Qin, HE Qun, LI Jian-ming, et al.Study on behavior of Al2O3inV-bearingtitaniferousmagnetitesinter[J].Iron and Steel, 2013, 38(1):1-4
[26]Eisenhüttenleute VD.Slag atlas. 2nd. ed[M]. Düsseldorf: Verlag Stahleisen GmbH, 1995, 130, 289.

基金

国家自然科学基金煤炭联合基金资助项目;国家自然科学基金重点项目

PDF(2143 KB)

22

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/