为明确高炉炉渣组分对死焦堆中炉渣静态滞留率的影响,采用自行设计的炉渣穿焦试验装置模拟高炉炉渣穿过炉缸死焦堆的过程,探究不同二元碱度(w(CaO)/w(SiO2))、镁铝比(w(MgO)/w(Al2O3))对炉渣滞留率的影响。试验结果表明,随着碱度的增加,炉渣穿过焦炭层的能力增强,滞留率降低;当炉渣镁铝比较低时,炉渣滞留率较高,当镁铝比为0.50～0.55时,滞留率出现最小值,当镁铝比较高时,由于渣焦间润湿性变好,“液桥”间炉渣滞留量增大,滞留率存在上升趋势;渣焦间润湿性较差。炉渣穿过焦炭层的过程主要为物理传输过程,但炉渣仍存在着向焦炭内部渗入的现象,渣焦界面发生反应生成SiC,该反应产物可改善渣焦界面润湿性。
Abstract
In order to investigate the influence of blast furnace slag composition on the static holdup rate of slag in the deadman, a self-designed slag penetration coke experimental device was used to simulate the process of blast furnace slag flowing through the deadman in the hearth. The effect of basicity (w(CaO)/w(SiO2)) and w(MgO)/w(Al2O3) on the static holdup rate of slag were also studied. The results show that as the basicity increasing, the ability of the slag dripping through the packed coke beds increases and the static holdup rate decreases. When the w(MgO)/w(Al2O3) is relatively low, the static holdup rate is high. When the w(MgO)/w(Al2O3) ranges from 0.5 to 0.55, the static holdup rate reaches its minimum. When the w(MgO)/w(Al2O3) is relatively high, the static holdup of "liquid bridges" becomes larger due to the better wettability between slag and coke, and the static holdup rate increases to a certain extent. The process of slag passing through the coke layer is mainly a physical transmission process due to the poor wettability between coke and slag. However, the SiC phase produced on the coke/slag interface as a result of the penetration of slag through the pores of the coke can improve the wettability.
关键词
高炉炉渣 /
静态滞留率 /
炉渣碱度 /
炉渣镁铝比 /
炉缸
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
blast furnace /
static holdup rate /
basicity /
w(MgO)/w(Al2O3) /
blast furnace hearth
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张建良,焦克新,刘征建,等.长寿高炉炉缸保护层综合调控技术[J].钢铁,2017, 52(12):1.(ZHANG Jian-liang,JIAO Ke-xin,LIU Zheng-jian,et al.Comprehensive regulation technology for hearth protective layer of blast furnace longevity[J]. Iron and Steel,2017,52(12):1.)
[2] JIAO K X,ZHANG J L,HOU Q F,et al.Analysis of the relationship between productivity and hearth wall temperature of a commercial blast furnace and model prediction[J].Steel Research International,2017,88(9):1.
[3] JIAO K X,ZHANG J L,CHEN C L,et al.Analysis of the deadman features in hearth based on blast furnace dissection by comprehensive image-processing technique[J].ISIJ International,2019,59(1):16.
[4] 赵沛,董鹏莉.碳排放是中国钢铁业未来不容忽视的问题[J].钢铁,2018,53(8):3.(ZHAO Pei,DONG Peng-li.Carbon emission cannot be ignored in future of Chinese steel industry[J].Iron and Steel,2018,53(8):3.)
[5] 张福明.中国高炉炼铁技术装备发展成就与展望[J].钢铁,2019,54(11):5.(ZHANG Fu-ming. Prospect and development achievements of blast furnace ironmaking technologies and equipments in China[J].Iron and Steel,2019,54(11):5.)
[6] 刘云彩.现代高炉操作[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2016.(LIU Yun-cai.Modern Blast Furnace Operation[M].Beijing:Metallurgical Industry Press,2016.)
[7] 陈川,安钢.炉缸活跃性指数及改善措施[J].钢铁,2018,53(1):29.(CHEN Chuan,AN Gang.Activity index and improvement measure of BF hearth[J].Iron and Steel,2018,53(1):29.)
[8] Shulman H L,Ullrich C F,Wells N. Performance of packed columns.I.Total,static,and operating holdups[J].AIChE Journal,1955,1(2):253.
[9] Husslage W M,Bakker T,Steeghs A G S,et al.Flow of molten slag and iron at 1 500 ℃ to 1 600 ℃ through packed coke beds[J].Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B,2005,36(6):776.
[10] Kawabata H,Liu Z,Fujita F,et al.Characteristics of liquid hold-ups in a soaked and unsoaked fixed bed[J].ISIJ International,2005,45(10):1473.
[11] Kawabata H,Shinmyou K,Harada T,et al.Influence of channeling factor on liquid hold-ups in an initially unsoaked bed[J].ISIJ International,2005, 45(10):1481.
[12] Fukutake T,Rajakumar V.Liquid holdup and abnormal flow phenomena in packed beds under conditions simulating the flow in the dropping zone of a blast furnace[J].Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan,1982,22(5):364.
[13] XIONG W,BI X,WANG G,et al.Calculation and analysis of liquid holdup in lower blast furnace by model experiments[J].Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B,2012,43(3):570.
[14] 罗霞光,郭东,王延平,等.高炉炉渣滞留量水模试验及分析[J].山东冶金, 2013,35(4):22.(LUO Xia-guang,GUO Dong,WANG Yan-ping,et al.Water model test and analysis of blast furnace slag holdup[J].Shandong Metallurgy,2013,35(4):22.)
[15] 沈峰满,郑海燕,姜鑫,等.高炉炼铁工艺中Al2O3的影响及适宜w(MgO)/w(Al2O3)的探讨[J].钢铁,2014,49(1):6.(SHEN Feng-man,ZHENG Hai-yan,JIANG Xin,et al.Influence of Al2O3 in blast furnace smelting and discussions on proper w(MgO)/w(Al2O3) ratio[J].Iron and Steel,2014,49(1):6.)
[16] 刘杰,赵东明,李建军,等.鞍钢高炉低镁渣冶炼技术研究与应用[J].钢铁,2018,53(3):24.(LIU Jie,ZHAO Dong-ming,LI Jian-jun,et al.Research and application of blast furnace's low w(MgO) slag in Ansteel[J].Iron and Steel, 2018,53(3):24.)
[17] MA H,JIAO K,ZHANG J,et al.Application and analysis of slag holdup model in BF deadman[J].Canadian Metallurgical Quarterly,2019,58(3):331.
[18] Megias Alguacil D,Gauckler L J.Capillary forces between two solid spheres linked by a concave liquid bridge:Regions of existence and forces mapping[J]. AIChE Journal,2009,55(5):1109.
[19] 刘迎立.基于氧气高炉工艺条件的熔融滴落带炉料冶金行为研究[D].北京:北京科技大学, 2017.(LIU Ying-li.Fundamental Research on Maturllurgical Behavior of Burden in Melting and Droppong Zone Based on the Process of Oxygen Blast Gurnace[D]. Beijing:University of Science and Technology Beijing,2017.)
[20] Kang T W,Gupta S,Saha-Chaudhury N,et al.Wetting and interfacial reaction investigations of coke/slag systems and associated liquid permeability of blast furnaces[J].ISIJ International,2005,45(11):1535.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}
基金
国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(51704019)
{{custom_fund}}
PDF(3161 KB)
