投审稿入口

Gyroid轴心梯度多孔结构设计及其力学性能研究

Design and research on mechanical properties of Gyroid axial gradient porous structure

  • 摘要: 基于圆锥曲面方程设计了一系列孔隙率沿轴心梯度变化的非均质Gyroid结构模型,并采用选择性激光熔化(SLM)技术进行3D打印。通过压缩试验与有限元模拟,系统研究了孔隙率梯度变化及加载方向对多孔结构力学性能和吸能特性的影响。结果表明,Gyroid轴心梯度多孔结构呈现力学性能各向异性。在垂直于梯度方向的加载条件下,梯度结构呈现强化效应,这主要源于低孔隙区域的应力集中;而在平行于梯度方向的加载条件下,梯度结构出现强度衰减现象,这主要源于高孔隙端的优先坍塌导致的渐进失效模式。梯度结构力学性能的强化与衰减程度均与梯度范围呈正相关。Gyroid轴心梯度结构的能量吸收效率普遍低于均质Gyroid结构,这主要源于孔隙率梯度界面处的非协调变形阻碍了应力传递。70%~30%孔隙率梯度结构在垂直于梯度方向上表现出最佳的力学与能量吸收特性,其屈服强度达92.1 MPa,平台应力为168.3 MPa,较均质结构分别提升15.86%和10.42%,最大能量吸收为(63.06±0.53) MJ/m3,与均质结构的63.97 MJ/m3基本相当。

     

    Abstract: A series of heterogeneous Gyroid structures with axially graded porosity were designed based on conical surface equations and fabricated using selective laser melting(SLM). Quasi-static compression tests and finite element simulations were conducted to systematically investigate the effects of porosity gradient and loading direction on the mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of the porous structures. The results indicate that Gyroid axial gradient porous structures exhibit anisotropic mechanical behavior. When loaded perpendicular to the gradient direction, the structures demonstrated a strengthening effect, attributed to stress concentration in low-porosity regions. In contrast, loading parallel to the gradient direction led to strength degradation, resulting from progressive collapse initiated in high-porosity regions. The extent of strengthening or weakening was positively correlated with the gradient range. The energy absorption efficiency of Gyroid axial gradient porous structures was generally lower than that of their homogeneous counterparts, primarily due to incompatible deformation at porosity gradient interfaces, which impeded stress transfer. The structure with a 70%-30% porosity gradient loaded perpendicular to the gradient direction exhibited the best overall mechanical and energy absorption performance, with a yield strength of 92.1 MPa and a plateau stress of 163.1 MPa, representing increases of 15.86% and 10.42%, respectively, compared to the homogeneous structure. Its maximum energy absorption reached(63.06±0.53) MJ/m~3, comparable to that of the homogeneous structure(63.97 MJ/m~3).

     

/

返回文章
返回