投审稿入口

国内外奥氏体易切削不锈钢易切削相对比探究

Comparative study on free-cutting phase of austenitic free-cutting stainless steel at home and abroad

  • 摘要: 易切削钢中易切削相的形态和分布是影响其切削性能的重要因素,为开发新型奥氏体易切削不锈钢,采用金相显微镜、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、能谱分析仪(EDS)、电子探针显微分析仪(EPMA)、显微硬度计和夹杂物三维腐刻技术对硫系(303F、303Cu、304F),铅系(303Pb)和硒系(304(添加Se))奥氏体易切削不锈钢中的易切削相进行观察对比分析,探究各易切削元素在钢中存在形式,对比各奥氏体易切削不锈钢易切削相和显微硬度的差异。结果表明:各类奥氏体易切削不锈钢中,304(添加Se)钢的平均等效直径和平均面积均最大,具体为平均等效直径为3.66μm,平均面积为15.10μm2,304(添加Se)钢夹杂物平均长宽比为2.54,夹杂物大部分呈椭球状,长宽比为1~3的夹杂物占比为73%,显著高于303Cu钢的58%和303Pb钢的55%;各易切削元素在钢中存在形式不一,S在钢中形成易切削相MnS,Cu在钢中固溶于钢基体中,Pb以团聚状单独存在于钢中或分布于MnS两端,Se在钢中生成Mn(Se, S)复合夹杂物,能抵抗轧制变形使形貌趋于纺锤形,部分Mn(Se, S)复合夹杂物包裹硬质Al2O3核心改善钢材切削性能;各类奥氏体易切削不锈钢中,304F钢平均显微硬度值最高,为309HV0.1,304(添加Se)钢平均显微硬度值为229HV0.1,303Cu钢由于Cu元素减少应变硬化的作用其平均显微硬度值最低,硬度值为156HV0.1

     

    Abstract: The morphology and distribution of free-cutting phases in free-cutting steel are important factors influencing their cutting properties. In order to develop new austenitic free-cutting stainless steels, the free-cutting phases in chalcogenide(303F, 303Cu, 304F), lead-based(303Pb), and selenium-based(304Se) austenitic free-cutting stainless steels were observed and analyzed by metallographic microscopy, scanning electron microscopy(SEM), energy dispersive spectrometry(EDS), electron probe microanalyzer(EPMA), microhardness tester and inclusion three-dimensional corrosion etching technology. The existence forms of each free-cutting element in steel were investigated, and the differences of free-cutting phases and microhardness in each austenitic free-cutting stainless steel were compared. The results showed that among all kinds of austenitic free-cutting stainless steels, the 304(Se addition) steel exhibited the largest average equivalent diameter and average area. Specifically, the average equivalent diameter was 3.66 μm, and the average area was 15.10 μm2. The average aspect ratio of inclusions in 304(Se addition) steel was 2.54, and most of the inclusions were ellipsoidal-shaped. The inclusions with aspect ratio of 1-3 accounted for 73%, which was significantly higher than that of 58% in 303Cu steel and 55% in 303Pb steel. The existence forms of free-cutting elements in the steel were different: S in the steel formed free-cutting phase MnS; Cu existed in solid solution in the steel matrix; Pb existed in steel in the form of agglomerate or it was distributed in two ends of MnS; Se formed Mn(Se, S) composite inclusions in the steel which could resist rolling deformation so that the morphology tended to be fusiform; some Mn(Se, S) composite inclusions wrapped the hard Al2O3 core to improve the cutting performance of steel. Among various types of austenitic free-cutting stainless steel, 304F steel had the highest average micro-hardness value, which was 309 HV0.1. The average micro-hardness value of 304(Se addition) steel was 229HV0.1. Due to the effect of Cu to reduce the strain hardening, the average micro-hardness value of 303Cu steel was the lowest, i.e., 156HV0.1.

     

/

返回文章
返回