投审稿入口

熔融制样-X射线荧光光谱法测定高锰铁矿石中10种主量组分

Determination of 10 major components in high-manganese iron ore by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with fusion sample preparation

  • 摘要: X射线荧光光谱法(XRF)在分析高锰铁矿石时,由于Mn含量异常(w(MnO)>2%)会导致Fe2O3测定结果出现负偏差,且常规10∶1稀释比熔融制样易出现样片炸裂、成型困难等问题,为此,本研究对校准方法、制样条件与干扰校正进行了系统优化。首先,通过将锰矿石和铁矿石国家一级标准物质按比例混合,配制系列梯度校准样品,拓宽了MnO和Fe2O3的测定范围,弥补了高锰(w(MnO)>0.5%)与高铁(w(Fe2O3)>30%)含量区间的校准空白。其次,通过优化稀释比、熔融温度与时间等制样条件,确定最佳熔样方案为稀释比14∶1、加入LiBr溶液和NH4I溶液为脱模剂、在1 050 ℃下熔融10 min,显著提高了熔片质量与制备成功率。最后,采用理论α系数法与经验系数法相结合校正基体效应,并扣除Fe Kα谱线中Mn Kβ谱线的重叠干扰,有效解决了高铁背景下高锰引起的Fe2O3测定失真问题。采用实验方法对高锰铁矿石样品中SiO2、Al2O3、Fe2O3、CaO、MgO、K2O、Na2O、TiO2、P2O5、MnO 10种主量组分进行测定,结果的相对标准偏差(RSD,n=6)为0.29%~8.3%。其中低含量组分Na2O的RSD相对较高,但所有测定值均满足DZ/T 0130—2006《地质矿产实验室测试质量管理规范》要求。进一步使用铁矿石标准样品进行正确度验证,各组分测定值与标准值吻合良好,相对误差符合规范要求。另选取某矿区2个高铁高锰铁矿石样品,与国家标准方法(重量法测定SiO2,滴定法测定Al2O3、CaO、MgO,分光光度法测定Fe2O3、TiO2、P2O5,原子吸收光谱法测定Na2O、K2O、MnO)进行对比,结果显示两种方法测定结果一致,均符合DZG 93—07《铁矿石分析规程》的误差允许范围。本研究建立的高锰铁矿石XRF分析方法,成功克服了高锰基体干扰与制样难题,适用于实际样品分析。

     

    Abstract: When X-ray fluorescence spectrometry(XRF) is applied to the analysis of high-manganese iron ore,the abnormal manganese content(w(MnO)>2%) will cause negative deviation in Fe2O3 determination results.In addition,the conventional fusion preparation with a dilution ratio of 10∶1 easily leads to cracking of fused bead and poor molding difficulty.To address these issues,the calibration method,sample preparation conditions and interference correction were systematically optimized in this study.Firstly,a series of gradient calibration samples were prepared by proportionally mixing national first-grade certified reference materials of manganese ore and iron ore,which expanded the linear determination ranges for MnO and Fe2O3,and filled the calibration blank for high-manganese(w(MnO)>0.5%) and high-iron(w(Fe2O3)>30%) content intervals.Secondly,by optimizing the fusion preparation conditions such as dilution ratio,fusion temperature and time,the optimal fusion procedure was determined:a dilution ratio of 14∶1,addition of LiBr solution and NH4I solution as release agents,and fusion at 1 050 ℃ for 10 min.This procedure significantly improved the preparation quality and success rate of fused bead.Finally,the combination of theoretical α coefficient method and empirical coefficient method was adopted to correct the matrix effect.The overlapping interference of Mn Kβ spectral line on Fe Kβ spectral line was deducted,which effectively eliminated the distortion of Fe2O3 measurement results caused by high-manganese under high-iron background.The proposed method was used to determine 10 major components in high-manganese iron ore sample,including SiO2,Al2O3,Fe2O3,CaO,MgO,K2O,Na2O,TiO2,P2O5 and MnO.The relative standard deviations (RSD,n=6) of the results ranged from 0.29% to 8.3%.The RSD for the low-content Na2O component was relatively high,but all determination results could meet the requirements of DZ/T 0130-2006 The Specification of Testing Quality Management for Geological Laboratories.The trueness was further verified using reference materials iron ore.The determined values of each component were in good agreement with the standard values,and the relative errors could meet the specification requirements.Additionally,two high-iron high-manganese iron ore samples from a mining area were analyzed,and the results were compared with those obtained by national standard methods(gravimetry for SiO2;titrimetry for Al2O3,CaO,and MgO;spectrophotometry for Fe2O3,TiO2,and P2O5;atomic absorption spectrometry for Na2O,K2O,and MnO).The results showed good consistency between the two methods,and all errors conformed to the allowable range specified in DZG 93-07 Analytical Procedures for Iron Ores.The XRF analysis method for high-manganese iron ores established in this study successfully overcame the challenges of high-manganese matrix interference and sample preparation difficulties,and it was suitable for the analysis of actual samples.

     

/

返回文章
返回