投审稿入口

金属轧制工业AI的探索与实践

Exploration and practice of industrial AI for metal rolling

  • 摘要: 金属材料制造过程连续难停机、关键内部状态难以直接测量、操作与质量结果之间存在明显滞后、故障样本稀少而失效代价高,决定了轧制工业AI不能停留于预测与生成层面,而必须走向目标驱动的感知-推演-决策-执行-反馈闭环。本文以目标驱动为主线,剖析人工智能由生成式AI向智能体AI、物理AI演进的能力跃迁,提出在“数据密集-智能涌现-人机协同”科研范式基础上显式引入“目标驱动”要素,形成面向工业控制的新范式;以V(状态表征)-M(记忆预测)-C(推演决策)功能闭环刻画世界模型核心能力,明确世界模型与数字孪生、具身智能、物理AI之间的联系与区别,并归纳全栈支撑、空间模拟与抽象预测三条世界模型技术路线及其瓶颈。在此基础上,构建以云端世界模型为全局“知”、以领域专业智能体与确定性控制为现场“行”、以全栈式垂直整合为工程基础的轧制工业AI系统架构。针对组织性能、外形尺寸和形状质量在可测性、机理成熟度与执行复杂度上的显著差异,分别提出“数据先行-知识赋能”“机理主导-数据补偿”“问题牵引-虚实融合”三条差异化建模路径。典型工程案例表明,相关技术已在单一领域形成可验证的局部闭环,正加速向跨工序、多目标协同的全流程自主决策演进,为钢铁等金属工业及其他大型复杂流程工业的智能化转型提供了理论基础与工程路径。

     

    Abstract: Continuous processing, inaccessible internal states, pronounced lag between actions and quality outcomes, and rare-yet-costly failure samples distinguish the manufacturing of metallic materials from discrete manufacturing and dictate that industrial AI for steel rolling cannot remain at the level of prediction and generation, but must advance toward a goal-driven closed loop of perception, inference, decision-making, execution, and feedback. Taking goal-drivenness as the central thread, this paper analyzes the capability leap of artificial intelligence from generative AI to agentic AI and Physical AI, and proposes explicitly introducing “goal-driven” into the “data-intensive-intelligence-emergent-human-machine collaborative” paradigm to form a new paradigm for industrial control. A Vision-Memory-Controller (VMC) functional loop is used to characterize the core capabilities of the world model, clarifying its relationship to and distinction from digital twins, embodied intelligence, and Physical AI; three technical routes—full-stack-supported, spatial-simulation-based, and abstract-prediction-based—are summarized together with their bottlenecks. On this basis, a rolling industrial AI system architecture is constructed, in which the cloud-based world model provides global “Knowing,” domain-specific agents together with deterministic control provide field-level “Acting,” and full-stack vertical integration provides the engineering foundation. Given the marked differences among microstructure/properties, geometric dimensions, and shape quality in measurability, mechanism maturity, and execution complexity, three differentiated modeling paths are proposed: “data first—knowledge empowered,” “mechanism led—data compensated,” and “problem driven—virtual-physical integrated.” Representative engineering cases show that the relevant technologies have formed verifiable local closed loops within individual domains and are accelerating toward cross-process, multi-objective coordinated full-process autonomous decision-making, providing a theoretical foundation and engineering pathway for the intelligent transformation of metal industries such as iron and steel, as well as other large-scale complex process industries.

     

/

返回文章
返回