钢轨表面疲劳裂纹扩展机制

doi:10.13228/j.boyuan.issn0449-749x.20160352

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (0 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要针对轮轨接触疲劳问题，基于Hertz接触理论与库伦摩擦定律，建立含表面裂纹的轮轨接触疲劳计算模型，并对加载位置、轴重、摩擦因数等因素对裂纹扩展速率的影响进行研究。结果表明，轮轨滚动接触的表面裂纹为I-II型裂纹，且以II型扩展为主，其最容易发生断裂的位置在接触斑边缘。轴重和摩擦力是影响轮轨接触疲劳的两个重要因素；随着轴重的增加，应力强度因子[KI、][KII]均呈增加趋势，20 t相对于10 t分别增加359%和185%；随着摩擦因数的增加，应力强度因子[KI、][KII]均呈增加趋势，0.3的摩擦因数相对于无摩擦分别增加了108.7%和119.3%，表明摩擦力的存在明显加剧了裂纹扩展速率。在钢轨涂油养护时，应优先选用固体润滑剂。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘杰

关键词 ：轮轨接触, 疲劳, 裂纹, 轴重, 摩擦系数, ANSYS

Abstract：The contact fatigue of wheel and rail was studied. Based on the Hertz contact theory and the coulomb law of friction， the calculation model of wheel/rail contact fatigue with rail surface crack was established， and the influence of loading position， axle load， friction coefficient on the crack propagation rate was analyzed， respectively. The results show that， the surface crack of wheel/rail contact includes sliding mode and opening mode， the major damage of crack is the sliding mode， and the most dangerous position for crack leading to fracture is the edge of contact area. The axle load and friction are two important factors affecting the fatigue of rail. As the axle load increases， the[KI]and[KII]of stress intensity increase. The[KI]and[KII]under the axle load of 20 t increase by 359% and 185%， respectively， compared to that under the axle of 10 t. With the increase of the coefficient friction， the[KI]and[KII]increase. The[KI]and[KII]under the state of friction coefficient 0.3 increase by 108.7% and 119.3%， respectively， compared to that under no friction. It is clear that the friction force can accelerate the crack growth obviously. Reducing the friction coefficient is an effective method to retard the fatigue of wheel/rail contact， and the solid lubricant should be used firstly when curing the rail.

收稿日期: 2016-08-01 出版日期: 2017-04-18

引用本文:

刘杰. 钢轨表面疲劳裂纹扩展机制[J]. 钢铁, 2017, 52(4): 67-71. LIU Jie. Analysis of propagation mechanism of fatigue crack on rail surface. Iron and Steel, 2017, 52(4): 67-71.

链接本文:

http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_gt/CN/10.13228/j.boyuan.issn0449-749x.20160352 或 http://www.chinamet.cn/Jweb_gt/CN/Y2017/V52/I4/67

[1]	陈颜堂，刘冬雨，方鸿生.钢轨钢的滚动接触疲劳[J].钢铁研究学报，2000，12(5):50-54.
[1]	陈颜堂，刘冬雨，方鸿生.钢轨钢的滚动接触疲劳[J].钢铁研究学报，2000，12(5):50-54.
[2]	史密斯.钢轨滚动接触疲劳的进一步研究[J].中国铁道科学,2002,23(3):43-46.
[2]	史密斯.钢轨滚动接触疲劳的进一步研究[J].中国铁道科学,2002,23(3):43-46.
[3]	广州铁路（集团）公司工务处.广深线钢轨伤损问题研讨会交流资料[R].广州：广州铁路（集团）公司，2003.
[3]	广州铁路（集团）公司工务处.广深线钢轨伤损问题研讨会交流资料[R].广州：广州铁路（集团）公司，2003.
[4]	Bold P E , Brown M W , Allen R J .shear mode crack growth and rolling contact fatigue [J]. Wear,1991,144:307-317.
[4]	Bold P E , Brown M W , Allen R J .shear mode crack growth and rolling contact fatigue [J]. Wear,1991,144:307-317.
[5]	Dubourg M C, Villechaise B. Analysis of multiple fatigue cracks-part I theory [J]. ASME , Journal of Tribology, 1992, 144: 455-461.
[5]	Dubourg M C, Villechaise B. Analysis of multiple fatigue cracks-part I theory [J]. ASME , Journal of Tribology, 1992, 144: 455-461.
[6]	Dubourg M C, Villechaise B, Godet M. Analysis of multiple fatigue cracks-part II results [J]. ASME, Journal of Tribology, 1992, 144: 462-468.
[6]	Dubourg M C, Villechaise B, Godet M. Analysis of multiple fatigue cracks-part II results [J]. ASME, Journal of Tribology, 1992, 144: 462-468.
[7]	Alfredsson B. A Study on Contact Fatigue Mechanisms[D]. Department of Solid Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,2000.
[7]	Alfredsson B. A Study on Contact Fatigue Mechanisms[D]. Department of Solid Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,2000.
[8]	Olsson M. Contact Fatigue and Tensile Stresses [C] //Engineering Against Fatigue, Sheffield: AA Balkema, 1999: 651-657.
[8]	Olsson M. Contact Fatigue and Tensile Stresses [C] //Engineering Against Fatigue, Sheffield: AA Balkema, 1999: 651-657.
[9]	江晓禹,金学松.考虑表面微观粗糙度的轮轨接触弹塑性分析[J].西南交通大学学报，2001,36(6): 588-590.
[9]	江晓禹,金学松.考虑表面微观粗糙度的轮轨接触弹塑性分析[J].西南交通大学学报，2001,36(6): 588-590.
[10]	江晓禹，金学松. 轮轨间的液态介质和表面微观粗糙度对接触表面疲劳损伤的影响[J].机械工程学报，2004, 40(8):18-23.
[10]	江晓禹，金学松. 轮轨间的液态介质和表面微观粗糙度对接触表面疲劳损伤的影响[J].机械工程学报，2004, 40(8):18-23.
[11]	曹世豪，江晓禹，文良华. 轴重和摩擦力对轮轨接触疲劳的影响研究[J]. 表面技术，2013, 42(6):10-14.
[11]	曹世豪，江晓禹，文良华. 轴重和摩擦力对轮轨接触疲劳的影响研究[J]. 表面技术，2013, 42(6):10-14.
[12]	金学松，杜星，郭俊，等.钢轨打磨技术研究进展[J].西南交通大学学报，2010, 45(1): 1-11.
[12]	金学松，杜星，郭俊，等.钢轨打磨技术研究进展[J].西南交通大学学报，2010, 45(1): 1-11.
[13]	曹世豪，李煦，张四放，等. Hertz理论与有限元法分析轮轨接触疲劳的差异性研究[J]. 机械工程学报，2015, 51(6): 126-134.
[13]	曹世豪，李煦，张四放，等. Hertz理论与有限元法分析轮轨接触疲劳的差异性研究[J]. 机械工程学报，2015, 51(6): 126-134.
[14]	Paris P C, Sih G C. Stress analysis of cracks[J]. Fracture Toughness Testing and Its Applications, 1965: 30-81.
[14]	Paris P C, Sih G C. Stress analysis of cracks[J]. Fracture Toughness Testing and Its Applications, 1965: 30-81.
[15]	金学松, 张雪珊, 张剑. 轮轨关系研究中的力学问题[J]. 机械强度, 2005, 27(4): 408-418.
[15]	金学松, 张雪珊, 张剑. 轮轨关系研究中的力学问题[J]. 机械强度, 2005, 27(4): 408-418.
[16]	金学松，杜星，郭俊，等.钢轨打磨技术研究进展[J].西南交通大学学报，2010, 45(1) 1-11.
[16]	金学松，杜星，郭俊，等.钢轨打磨技术研究进展[J].西南交通大学学报，2010, 45(1) 1-11.
[17]	Bogdanski S, Olzak M ,Stupnicki J. The effects of face friction and tractive force on propagation of 3D squat type of rolling contact fatigue crack[C]// Proceedings of the Second Mini Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems Budapest, 1996: 164-173.
[17]	Bogdanski S, Olzak M ,Stupnicki J. The effects of face friction and tractive force on propagation of 3D squat type of rolling contact fatigue crack[C]// Proceedings of the Second Mini Conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems Budapest, 1996: 164-173.
[18]	Lunden R. Cracks in railway wheels under rolling contact load[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Wheel set Congress. Sydney, 1992: 163-167.
[18]	Lunden R. Cracks in railway wheels under rolling contact load[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Wheel set Congress. Sydney, 1992: 163-167.